FPAFF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
FPAFY
Price
$4.14
Change
-$0.12 (-2.82%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
3.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPAFF vs FPAFY

Header iconFPAFF vs FPAFY Comparison
Open Charts FPAFF vs FPAFYBanner chart's image
First Pacific
Price$0.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$7K
Capitalization3.49B
First Pacific
Price$4.14
Change-$0.12 (-2.82%)
Volume$51.36K
Capitalization3.49B
FPAFF vs FPAFY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAFF vs. FPAFY commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To understand the difference between First Pacific Co. Ltd. (FPAFF) vs. First Pacific Co. Ltd. - ADR (FPAFY) it is enough to know the definitions of ADR

ADR - American depositary receipt (ADR) is a certificate issued by a U.S. depositary bank representing a specified number of shares (often 1 share) of a foreign company's stock. ADRs are denominated in U.S. dollars and trade on U.S. stock markets and OTC depending on the ADRs classification.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAFF: $0.78 vs. FPAFY: $4.14)
Brand notoriety: FPAFF and FPAFY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAFF: 14% vs. FPAFY: 156%
Market capitalization -- FPAFF: $3.49B vs. FPAFY: $3.49B
FPAFF [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $3.49B. FPAFY’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $3.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $230.77B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $6.86B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAFF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFPAFY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FPAFY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FPAFF and FPAFY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAFF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FPAFY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAFF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FPAFY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPAFY is a better buy in the short-term than FPAFF.

Price Growth

FPAFF (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -2.05% price change this week, while FPAFY (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +183.99%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.97% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPAFF($3.49B) and FPAFY($3.49B) have the same market capitalization . FPAFY has higher P/E ratio than FPAFF: FPAFY (4.93) vs FPAFF (4.63). FPAFY YTD gains are higher at: 56.367 vs. FPAFF (37.593). FPAFY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.07B vs. FPAFF (2.86B). FPAFY has more cash in the bank: 2.86B vs. FPAFF (2.35B). FPAFF has less debt than FPAFY: FPAFF (11.7B) vs FPAFY (12.6B). FPAFF (10.5B) and FPAFY (10.1B) have equivalent revenues.
FPAFFFPAFYFPAFF / FPAFY
Capitalization3.49B3.49B100%
EBITDA2.86B3.07B93%
Gain YTD37.59356.36767%
P/E Ratio4.634.9394%
Revenue10.5B10.1B104%
Total Cash2.35B2.86B82%
Total Debt11.7B12.6B93%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAFF vs FPAFY: Fundamental Ratings
FPAFF
FPAFY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9476
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
133
SMR RATING
1..100
9797
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6355
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FPAFF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFY (16). This means that FPAFF’s stock grew similarly to FPAFY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (13). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's SMR Rating (97) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (97). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's Price Growth Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (49). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

FPAFY's P/E Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as FPAFF (63). This means that FPAFY’s stock grew similarly to FPAFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAFFFPAFY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
77%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPAFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FPAFY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TAGBX2.80N/A
N/A
Templeton Global Balanced A
CSUZX24.86N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
PEQCX37.81N/A
N/A
Putnam Large Cap Value C
KGLCX15.88N/A
N/A
Kinetics Global Adv C
CSMFX24.69N/A
N/A
Carillon Scout Mid Cap C

FPAFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFF and BRRLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFF and BRRLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFF
1D Price
Change %
FPAFF100%
-0.96%
BRRLY - FPAFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
CUSI - FPAFF
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
FPAFY - FPAFF
13%
Poorly correlated
-2.82%
CIADY - FPAFF
11%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
CIADF - FPAFF
5%
Poorly correlated
-3.73%
More

FPAFY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAFY and WHGLY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAFY and WHGLY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAFY
1D Price
Change %
FPAFY100%
-2.82%
WHGLY - FPAFY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.51%
CUSI - FPAFY
16%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
GUZOF - FPAFY
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FPAFF - FPAFY
13%
Poorly correlated
-0.96%
CIADY - FPAFY
10%
Poorly correlated
-1.89%
More