FPAY
Price
$1.37
Change
-$0.01 (-0.72%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
29.45M
66 days until earnings call
R
Price
$150.59
Change
+$2.38 (+1.61%)
Updated
Jun 6 closing price
Capitalization
5.32B
47 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPAY vs R

Header iconFPAY vs R Comparison
Open Charts FPAY vs RBanner chart's image
FlexShopper
Price$1.37
Change-$0.01 (-0.72%)
Volume$22.97K
Capitalization29.45M
Ryder System
Price$150.59
Change+$2.38 (+1.61%)
Volume$169.46K
Capitalization5.32B
FPAY vs R Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAY vs. R commentary
Jun 07, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPAY is a StrongBuy and R is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 07, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAY: $1.37 vs. R: $150.59)
Brand notoriety: FPAY and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAY: 45% vs. R: 42%
Market capitalization -- FPAY: $29.45M vs. R: $5.32B
FPAY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $29.45M. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $13.11B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than FPAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAY’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAY’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPAY is a better buy in the short-term than R.

Price Growth

FPAY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -2.49% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +2.35% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.59%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.10%.

Reported Earning Dates

FPAY is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+0.32% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
R($5.32B) has a higher market cap than FPAY($29.4M). R has higher P/E ratio than FPAY: R (13.76) vs FPAY (2.02). R YTD gains are higher at: -3.031 vs. FPAY (-19.883). R has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. FPAY (83.5M). R has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FPAY (5.73M). FPAY has less debt than R: FPAY (108M) vs R (8.15B). R has higher revenues than FPAY: R (11.8B) vs FPAY (108M).
FPAYRFPAY / R
Capitalization29.4M5.32B1%
EBITDA83.5M2.73B3%
Gain YTD-19.883-3.031656%
P/E Ratio2.0213.7615%
Revenue108M11.8B1%
Total Cash5.73M204M3%
Total Debt108M8.15B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAY vs R: Fundamental Ratings
FPAY
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
938
SMR RATING
1..100
9451
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6051
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9772
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

R's Valuation (35) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAY (85). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FPAY (93). This means that R’s stock grew significantly faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's SMR Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAY (94). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's Price Growth Rating (51) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FPAY (60). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's P/E Growth Rating (72) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FPAY (97). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAYR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 24 days ago
74%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNGE33.990.30
+0.88%
First Trust S-Network Strmng & Gmng ETF
ICVT88.220.32
+0.36%
iShares Convertible Bond ETF
IQHI26.04N/A
N/A
NYLI MacKay High Income ETF
PML7.38-0.02
-0.27%
PIMCO Municipal Income FUND II
BSL14.14-0.06
-0.42%
Blackstone Senior Floating Rate 2027 Term Fund

FPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAY and SOFI have been poorly correlated (+24% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAY and SOFI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAY
1D Price
Change %
FPAY100%
-0.36%
SOFI - FPAY
24%
Poorly correlated
+4.17%
PYPL - FPAY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.32%
DFS - FPAY
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
R - FPAY
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.61%
AAMCF - FPAY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

R and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, R has been closely correlated with OMF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 74% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if R jumps, then OMF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To R
1D Price
Change %
R100%
+1.61%
OMF - R
74%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
AXP - R
73%
Closely correlated
+2.20%
ENVA - R
72%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
SYF - R
71%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
URI - R
70%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
More