FPAY
Price
$1.43
Change
-$0.06 (-4.03%)
Updated
Mar 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
29.45M
8 days until earnings call
R
Price
$158.65
Change
-$5.82 (-3.54%)
Updated
Mar 3, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.32B
51 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FPAY vs R

Header iconFPAY vs R Comparison
Open Charts FPAY vs RBanner chart's image
FlexShopper
Price$1.43
Change-$0.06 (-4.03%)
Volume$1.1K
Capitalization29.45M
Ryder System
Price$158.65
Change-$5.82 (-3.54%)
Volume$1.38K
Capitalization5.32B
FPAY vs R Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPAY vs. R commentary
Mar 03, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPAY is a Hold and R is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Mar 03, 2025
Stock price -- (FPAY: $1.49 vs. R: $164.47)
Brand notoriety: FPAY and R are both not notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPAY: 64% vs. R: 127%
Market capitalization -- FPAY: $29.45M vs. R: $5.32B
FPAY [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $29.45M. R’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $5.32B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPAY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileR’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FPAY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • R’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the long-term than FPAY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPAY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while R’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPAY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • R’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, R is a better buy in the short-term than FPAY.

Price Growth

FPAY (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а -6.88% price change this week, while R (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was -0.29% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was -1.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +57.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

FPAY is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

R is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (-1.70% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
R($5.32B) has a higher market cap than FPAY($29.4M). R has higher P/E ratio than FPAY: R (13.76) vs FPAY (2.02). R YTD gains are higher at: 5.365 vs. FPAY (-12.865). R has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.73B vs. FPAY (83.5M). R has more cash in the bank: 204M vs. FPAY (5.73M). FPAY has less debt than R: FPAY (108M) vs R (8.15B). R has higher revenues than FPAY: R (11.8B) vs FPAY (108M).
FPAYRFPAY / R
Capitalization29.4M5.32B1%
EBITDA83.5M2.73B3%
Gain YTD-12.8655.365-240%
P/E Ratio2.0213.7615%
Revenue108M11.8B1%
Total Cash5.73M204M3%
Total Debt108M8.15B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPAY vs R: Fundamental Ratings
FPAY
R
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
78
Overvalued
29
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1002
SMR RATING
1..100
9495
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4744
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9636
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

R's Valuation (29) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAY (78). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is significantly better than the same rating for FPAY (100). This means that R’s stock grew significantly faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

FPAY's SMR Rating (94) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as R (95). This means that FPAY’s stock grew similarly to R’s over the last 12 months.

R's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FPAY (47). This means that R’s stock grew similarly to FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

R's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FPAY (96). This means that R’s stock grew somewhat faster than FPAY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPAYR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
75%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
88%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FPAY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
WBIY30.290.38
+1.27%
WBI Power Factor® High Dividend ETF
EWC41.230.43
+1.05%
iShares MSCI Canada ETF
MLN18.000.07
+0.39%
VanEck Long Muni ETF
VICE33.300.09
+0.28%
AdvisorShares Vice ETF
DBO14.19-0.02
-0.14%
Invesco DB Oil

FPAY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPAY and DFS have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPAY and DFS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPAY
1D Price
Change %
FPAY100%
+7.19%
DFS - FPAY
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.09%
SNFCA - FPAY
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.32%
R - FPAY
21%
Poorly correlated
+3.03%
AAMCF - FPAY
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTAI - FPAY
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.71%
More