FPBC
Price
$5.15
Change
-$0.21 (-3.92%)
Updated
Sep 22 closing price
Capitalization
22.33M
VALIF
Price
$118.35
Change
+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Updated
Jan 30 closing price
Capitalization
2.49B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPBC vs VALIF

Header iconFPBC vs VALIF Comparison
Open Charts FPBC vs VALIFBanner chart's image
First Pacific Ban
Price$5.15
Change-$0.21 (-3.92%)
Volume$3.6K
Capitalization22.33M
Valiant Holding Bern
Price$118.35
Change+$6.35 (+5.67%)
Volume$162
Capitalization2.49B
FPBC vs VALIF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPBC vs. VALIF commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBC is a Hold and VALIF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FPBC: $5.15 vs. VALIF: $118.35)
Brand notoriety: FPBC and VALIF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPBC: 99% vs. VALIF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FPBC: $22.33M vs. VALIF: $2.49B
FPBC [@Regional Banks] is valued at $22.33M. VALIF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $2.49B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPBC’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileVALIF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FPBC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • VALIF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, VALIF is a better buy in the long-term than FPBC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPBC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • FPBC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

FPBC (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while VALIF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.37%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.18% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
VALIF($2.5B) has a higher market cap than FPBC($22.3M). FPBC has higher P/E ratio than VALIF: FPBC (13.55) vs VALIF (10.21). VALIF YTD gains are higher at: 5.672 vs. FPBC (0.982). FPBC has less debt than VALIF: FPBC (55M) vs VALIF (10.9B). VALIF has higher revenues than FPBC: VALIF (551M) vs FPBC (15.2M).
FPBCVALIFFPBC / VALIF
Capitalization22.3M2.5B1%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.9825.67217%
P/E Ratio13.5510.21133%
Revenue15.2M551M3%
Total Cash7.32MN/A-
Total Debt55M10.9B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPBC: Fundamental Ratings
FPBC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
83
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
77
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
83
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPBCVALIF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPBC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JDCAX62.08N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson Forty A
MSSYX9.92N/A
N/A
AMG Frontier Small Cap Growth Z
BRSUX15.56N/A
N/A
MFS Blended Research Small Cap Eq R4
MVTIX11.48N/A
N/A
Transamerica Mid Cap Value Opps I
ETILX60.50N/A
N/A
Eventide Gilead I

FPBC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPBC and APLO have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPBC and APLO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPBC
1D Price
Change %
FPBC100%
N/A
APLO - FPBC
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
PWBK - FPBC
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MTRBF - FPBC
14%
Poorly correlated
+1.33%
VALIF - FPBC
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLBK - FPBC
5%
Poorly correlated
+2.40%
More

VALIF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that VALIF and LYBC have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that VALIF and LYBC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To VALIF
1D Price
Change %
VALIF100%
N/A
LYBC - VALIF
33%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
EDVR - VALIF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.13%
SFDL - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BAFN - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
+16.52%
OAKV - VALIF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More