Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$40.24
Change-$0.69 (-1.69%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$26.71
Change-$0.39 (-1.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.9M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. MIAPX (221M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.30) vs MIAPX (1.94). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.16 vs. MIAPX (16.56). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.22 vs. MIAPX (-23.16).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.632 | 19.489 | 162% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 994M | 221M | 450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 1.94 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.16 | 16.56 | 176% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.14 | 32.07 | 141% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.22 | -23.16 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.00 | 36.65 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement