Ad is loading...
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$32.41
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$23.36
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Sep 19, 2024
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 708M vs. MIAPX (312M). MIAPX pays higher dividends than FPBFX: MIAPX (1.83) vs FPBFX (0.79). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (38 years) vs MIAPX (14 years). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.32 vs. FPBFX (46.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). MIAPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.94 vs. FPBFX (10.05). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 5.97 vs. MIAPX (-9.37).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.530 | 9.087 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 708M | 312M | 227% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.79 | 1.83 | 43% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.05 | 14.94 | 67% |
| Returns for 3 years | -28.07 | -39.71 | 71% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.97 | -9.37 | -64% |
| Returns for 10 years | 16.82 | 12.07 | 139% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...