Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$34.71
Change+$0.12 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.61M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$24.23
Change+$0.09 (+0.37%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.93M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Jun 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. MIAPX (215M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (5.43) vs MIAPX (2.35). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.27 vs. MIAPX (6.19). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.47 vs. MIAPX (-13.74).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 13.150 | 6.437 | 204% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 215M | 346% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 2.35 | 232% |
| Returns for 1 year | 18.27 | 6.19 | 295% |
| Returns for 3 years | 17.27 | 9.90 | 174% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.47 | -13.74 | -69% |
| Returns for 10 years | 34.05 | 18.72 | 182% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers