Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.13
Change+$0.32 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.99M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$27.75
Change+$0.20 (+0.73%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.51M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIAPX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 884M vs. MIAPX (211M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.72) vs MIAPX (2.12). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.13 vs. MIAPX (20.36). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.92 vs. MIAPX (-12.64).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.497 | 21.473 | 156% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 211M | 419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.72 | 2.12 | 222% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.13 | 20.36 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.48 | 36.23 | 148% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.92 | -12.64 | -102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.84 | 51.72 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement