Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$39.42
Change+$0.77 (+1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.66M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$26.47
Change+$0.51 (+1.96%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets208.27M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 845M vs. MIAPX (208M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.86) vs MIAPX (2.21). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.75 vs. MIAPX (14.18). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.88 vs. MIAPX (-14.26).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.950 | 16.711 | 173% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 208M | 406% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.86 | 2.21 | 219% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.75 | 14.18 | 203% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.42 | 22.81 | 177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.88 | -14.26 | -90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.09 | 46.30 | 160% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement