Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIAPX
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIAPX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$42.33
Change+$0.26 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.06M
Matthews Asia Growth Instl
Price$28.98
Change+$0.13 (+0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.93M
FPBFX vs MIAPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIAPX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MIAPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 959M vs. MIAPX (220M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIAPX: FPBFX (4.41) vs MIAPX (1.98). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIAPX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIAPX (15 years). MIAPX (1.12) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIAPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIAPX: FPBFX (0) vs MIAPX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 24.98 vs. MIAPX (17.85). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.37 vs. MIAPX (-11.77).
| FPBFX | MIAPX | FPBFX / MIAPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.12 | 78% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 37.619 | 27.205 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 959M | 220M | 436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 1.98 | 223% |
| Returns for 1 year | 24.98 | 17.85 | 140% |
| Returns for 3 years | 67.36 | 52.25 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.37 | -11.77 | -114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.03 | 52.63 | 141% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement