Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$36.28
Change+$0.19 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.61M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$15.86
Change+$0.04 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.47M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. MIPIX (561M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (5.43) vs MIPIX (2.42). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. MIPIX (15.14). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.70 vs. MIPIX (1.81).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.057 | 12.685 | 142% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 561M | 132% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 2.42 | 224% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.76 | 15.14 | 157% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.21 | 14.63 | 200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.70 | 1.81 | 755% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.91 | 11.45 | 331% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement