Ad is loading...
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$30.63
Change-$1.09 (-3.44%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.12M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$13.97
Change-$0.34 (-2.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets568.7M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 692M vs. MIPIX (569M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (5.81) vs MIPIX (2.56). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (14 years). MIPIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.88 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.01 vs. MIPIX (6.18). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 24.91 vs. MIPIX (12.62).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.99 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.99 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.762 | 1.835 | 205% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 692M | 569M | 122% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.81 | 2.56 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.01 | 6.18 | 194% |
| Returns for 3 years | -2.11 | -7.50 | 28% |
| Returns for 5 years | 24.91 | 12.62 | 197% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.21 | 1.88 | 1,074% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...