Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.13
Change+$0.32 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.99M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$16.93
Change+$0.09 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets565.42M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 884M vs. MIPIX (565M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (4.72) vs MIPIX (2.14). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.13 vs. MIPIX (16.84). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.92 vs. MIPIX (-9.03).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.497 | 19.951 | 168% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 565M | 156% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.72 | 2.14 | 220% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.13 | 16.84 | 197% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.48 | 29.35 | 182% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.92 | -9.03 | -143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.84 | 33.78 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers