Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$39.42
Change+$0.77 (+1.99%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets844.66M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$16.47
Change+$0.22 (+1.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets561.65M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Aug 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 845M vs. MIPIX (562M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (4.86) vs MIPIX (2.20). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). FPBFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. MIPIX (16.81). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.75 vs. MIPIX (16.08). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.88 vs. MIPIX (-5.79).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.09 | 80% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 28.950 | 17.315 | 167% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 845M | 562M | 150% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.86 | 2.20 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 28.75 | 16.08 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.42 | 21.27 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.88 | -5.79 | -222% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.09 | 35.48 | 209% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement