Ad is loading...
FPBFX vs MIPIX
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MIPIX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$31.76
Change+$0.19 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.12M
Matthews Asia Dividend Instl
Price$14.35
Change+$0.07 (+0.49%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets536.91M
FPBFX vs MIPIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MIPIX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MIPIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 692M vs. MIPIX (537M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MIPIX: FPBFX (5.81) vs MIPIX (2.56). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MIPIX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MIPIX (15 years). MIPIX (0.99) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MIPIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 75.88 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MIPIX: FPBFX (0) vs MIPIX (100000). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. MIPIX (7.99). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.20 vs. MIPIX (-0.56).
| FPBFX | MIPIX | FPBFX / MIPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.99 | 88% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.99 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 15 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.271 | 1.622 | 202% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 100000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 692M | 537M | 129% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.81 | 2.56 | 227% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 7.99 | 179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 1.42 | 688% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | -0.56 | -1,654% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.70 | -1.24 | -1,509% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...