Ad is loading...
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$31.76
Change+$0.19 (+0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets692.12M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$22.20
Change+$0.09 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets214.93M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Apr 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MPACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 692M vs. MPACX (215M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (5.81) vs MPACX (2.38). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.13) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.32 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.27 vs. MPACX (3.27). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 9.20 vs. MPACX (-12.45).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.13 | 77% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.271 | -1.251 | -262% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 692M | 215M | 322% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.81 | 2.38 | 245% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.27 | 3.27 | 437% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.75 | 0.45 | 2,177% |
| Returns for 5 years | 9.20 | -12.45 | -74% |
| Returns for 10 years | 18.70 | 5.16 | 363% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers