Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$41.13
Change+$0.32 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets883.99M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$27.37
Change+$0.20 (+0.74%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets210.51M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 884M vs. MPACX (211M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.72) vs MPACX (2.06). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 33.13 vs. MPACX (20.20). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 12.92 vs. MPACX (-13.37).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 33.497 | 21.349 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 884M | 211M | 419% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.72 | 2.06 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.13 | 20.20 | 164% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.48 | 35.62 | 150% |
| Returns for 5 years | 12.92 | -13.37 | -97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.84 | 49.06 | 155% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement