Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$40.02
Change-$0.22 (-0.55%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets994.35M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$26.31
Change-$0.03 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets220.9M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MPACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 994M vs. MPACX (221M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.30) vs MPACX (1.88). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 29.16 vs. MPACX (14.07). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 2.22 vs. MPACX (-25.95).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 31.632 | 17.642 | 179% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 994M | 221M | 450% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.30 | 1.88 | 229% |
| Returns for 1 year | 29.16 | 14.07 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.14 | 29.61 | 152% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.22 | -25.95 | -9% |
| Returns for 10 years | 61.00 | 32.31 | 189% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement