Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$42.33
Change+$0.26 (+0.62%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets959.06M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$28.29
Change-$0.29 (-1.01%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets219.93M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Oct 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Hold and MPACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 959M vs. MPACX (220M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (4.41) vs MPACX (1.91). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 25.97 vs. MPACX (18.40). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 14.07 vs. MPACX (-12.09).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 38.469 | 27.646 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 959M | 220M | 436% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.41 | 1.91 | 230% |
| Returns for 1 year | 25.97 | 18.40 | 141% |
| Returns for 3 years | 71.21 | 54.82 | 130% |
| Returns for 5 years | 14.07 | -12.09 | -116% |
| Returns for 10 years | 74.65 | 50.52 | 148% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement