Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPBFX vs MPACX
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison
Open Charts FPBFX vs MPACX
Fidelity Pacific Basin
Price$36.28
Change+$0.19 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets742.61M
Matthews Asia Growth Investor
Price$24.36
Change+$0.16 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets205.06M
FPBFX vs MPACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPBFX vs. MPACX commentary
Jun 29, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPBFX is a Buy and MPACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPBFX has more cash in the bank: 743M vs. MPACX (205M). FPBFX pays higher dividends than MPACX: FPBFX (5.43) vs MPACX (2.27). FPBFX was incepted earlier than MPACX: FPBFX (39 years) vs MPACX (22 years). MPACX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FPBFX (0.87). MPACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 184.44 vs. FPBFX (61.00). FPBFX has a lower initial minimum investment than MPACX: FPBFX (0) vs MPACX (2500). FPBFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 23.76 vs. MPACX (6.65). FPBFX return over 5 years is better than : 13.70 vs. MPACX (-16.89).
| FPBFX | MPACX | FPBFX / MPACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 1.25 | 70% |
| Fund Existence | 39 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 18.057 | 8.084 | 223% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 743M | 205M | 362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.43 | 2.27 | 239% |
| Returns for 1 year | 23.76 | 6.65 | 357% |
| Returns for 3 years | 29.21 | 13.00 | 225% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.70 | -16.89 | -81% |
| Returns for 10 years | 37.91 | 16.87 | 225% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement