Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPCSX vs TGIPX
FPCSX vs TGIPX Comparison
Open Charts FPCSX vs TGIPX
FPA Crescent Supra Institutional
Price$41.59
Change-$0.10 (-0.24%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets10.32B
T. Rowe Price Spectrum Mod Gr Allc I
Price$40.17
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.51B
FPCSX vs TGIPX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPCSX vs. TGIPX commentary
May 23, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPCSX is a Buy and TGIPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPCSX has more cash in the bank: 10.3B vs. TGIPX (3.51B). FPCSX pays higher dividends than TGIPX: FPCSX (2.95) vs TGIPX (1.80). FPCSX was incepted earlier than TGIPX: FPCSX (5 years) vs TGIPX (9 years). FPCSX (1.02) is less costly to investors than TGIPX (0.78). TGIPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 42.90 vs. FPCSX (10.00). TGIPX has a lower initial minimum investment than FPCSX: TGIPX (500000) vs FPCSX (100000000). TGIPX (2.53) and FPCSX (2.46) have marching annual gain over last year.
| FPCSX | TGIPX | FPCSX / TGIPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.00 | 0.64 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 0.78 | 131% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 3.578 | 3.423 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000000 | 500000 | 20,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 10.3B | 3.51B | 293% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.95 | 1.80 | 164% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.46 | 2.53 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 28.36 | 18.60 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 30.68 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers