Advertisement
FPE vs HBANP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPE is a Buy and HBANP is a Hold.
HBANP | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 4 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| FPE | HBANP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 50% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 40% | 2 days ago 47% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 27% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 41% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 57% | 2 days ago 37% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 55% | 2 days ago 53% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 63% | 10 days ago 42% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 56% | 4 days ago 54% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 44% | 2 days ago 52% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 48% | 2 days ago 53% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| GTIP | 48.86 | -0.08 | -0.17% |
| Goldman Sachs Acs Infl Protd USD Bd ETF | |||
| QMAR | 30.17 | -0.22 | -0.73% |
| FT Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF – Mar | |||
| ETG | 20.41 | -0.17 | -0.83% |
| Eaton Vance Tax-Advantaged Global Dividend Income Fund | |||
| BEDZ | 29.63 | -0.73 | -2.42% |
| AdvisorShares Hotel ETF | |||
| KBWR | 55.50 | -1.72 | -3.00% |
| Invesco KBW Regional Banking ETF | |||
FPE and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FPE has been loosely correlated with WTFCM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FPE jumps, then WTFCM could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FPE | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FPE | 100% | -0.17% | ||
| WTFCM - FPE | 62% Loosely correlated | +0.19% | ||
| ACGLN - FPE | 58% Loosely correlated | -0.45% | ||
| HBANP - FPE | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| WAFDP - FPE | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.57% | ||
| ACGLO - FPE | 57% Loosely correlated | -0.39% | ||
More | ||||
HBANP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HBANP has been closely correlated with FITBO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HBANP jumps, then FITBO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HBANP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HBANP | 100% | -0.57% | ||
| FITBO - HBANP | 67% Closely correlated | -1.59% | ||
| HBANL - HBANP | 56% Loosely correlated | -0.48% | ||
| TCBIO - HBANP | 55% Loosely correlated | -0.25% | ||
| FCNCO - HBANP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.46% | ||
| OZKAP - HBANP | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.50% | ||
More | ||||