Ad is loading...
FPHAX vs JNGLX
FPHAX vs JNGLX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. JNGLX commentary
Apr 25, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Buy and JNGLX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
JNGLX has more cash in the bank: 4.71B vs. FPHAX (1.19B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than JNGLX: FPHAX (1.20) vs JNGLX (0.34). FPHAX was incepted earlier than JNGLX: FPHAX (24 years) vs JNGLX (26 years). JNGLX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.70). FPHAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 44.00 vs. JNGLX (35.00). FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than JNGLX: FPHAX (0) vs JNGLX (2500). JNGLX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.64 vs. FPHAX (-10.15). JNGLX return over 5 years is better than : 12.37 vs. FPHAX (6.99).
| FPHAX | JNGLX | FPHAX / JNGLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.80 | 87% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.70 | 0.80 | 87% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -7.383 | -3.491 | 211% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.19B | 4.71B | 25% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.20 | 0.34 | 351% |
| Returns for 1 year | -10.15 | -7.64 | 133% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.33 | 2.99 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 6.99 | 12.37 | 57% |
| Returns for 10 years | 6.36 | 12.41 | 51% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers