Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPHAX vs PRHSX
FPHAX vs PRHSX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPHAX vs. PRHSX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPHAX is a Hold and PRHSX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PRHSX has more cash in the bank: 11B vs. FPHAX (1.08B). FPHAX pays higher dividends than PRHSX: FPHAX (1.29) vs PRHSX (0.01). FPHAX was incepted earlier than PRHSX: FPHAX (24 years) vs PRHSX (30 years). PRHSX (0.80) is less costly to investors than FPHAX (0.67). PRHSX (52.40) and FPHAX (51.00) have comparable annual turnover. FPHAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRHSX: FPHAX (0) vs PRHSX (2500). FPHAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -13.75 vs. PRHSX (-19.76). FPHAX return over 5 years is better than : 13.82 vs. PRHSX (-7.90).
| FPHAX | PRHSX | FPHAX / PRHSX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.80 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.274 | 2.075 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 2500 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.08B | 11B | 10% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.29 | 0.01 | 14,820% |
| Returns for 1 year | -13.75 | -19.76 | 70% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.22 | -8.84 | -229% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.82 | -7.90 | -175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 20.44 | 1.32 | 1,553% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement