Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPIFX vs FSNOX
FPIFX vs FSNOX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPIFX vs. FSNOX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPIFX is a Hold and FSNOX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSNOX has more cash in the bank: 12.8B vs. FPIFX (6.81B). FPIFX pays higher dividends than FSNOX: FPIFX (2.64) vs FSNOX (2.47). FPIFX was incepted earlier than FSNOX: FPIFX (16 years) vs FSNOX (8 years). FSNOX (0.49) is less costly to investors than FPIFX (0.12). FSNOX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 14.00 vs. FPIFX (13.00). FPIFX (0) and FSNOX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FPIFX (7.25) and FSNOX (7.05) have marching annual gain over last year. FPIFX return over 5 years is better than : 23.37 vs. FSNOX (6.86).
| FPIFX | FSNOX | FPIFX / FSNOX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.49 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.12 | 0.49 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 16 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.341 | 9.868 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 6.81B | 12.8B | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.64 | 2.47 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.25 | 7.05 | 103% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.26 | 30.07 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 23.37 | 6.86 | 340% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.16 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement