Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FPKFX vs RLBAX
FPKFX vs RLBAX Comparison
Open Charts FPKFX vs RLBAX
Fidelity Puritan K6
Price$16.50
Change+$0.11 (+0.67%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.02B
American Funds American Balanced R1
Price$36.17
Change+$0.09 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets249.42B
FPKFX vs RLBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FPKFX vs. RLBAX commentary
Jun 28, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPKFX is a Buy and RLBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RLBAX has more cash in the bank: 249B vs. FPKFX (2.02B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than RLBAX: FPKFX (1.77) vs RLBAX (1.23). FPKFX was incepted earlier than RLBAX: FPKFX (6 years) vs RLBAX (23 years). RLBAX (1.31) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.32). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.00 vs. RLBAX (44.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than RLBAX: FPKFX (0) vs RLBAX (250). RLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.77 vs. FPKFX (6.00). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 61.67 vs. RLBAX (38.62).
| FPKFX | RLBAX | FPKFX / RLBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.32 | 1.31 | 24% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.501 | 6.620 | 38% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.02B | 249B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.77 | 1.23 | 144% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.00 | 6.77 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.18 | 31.51 | 137% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.67 | 38.62 | 160% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 57.01 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers