FPRGF
Price
$0.19
Change
-$0.13 (-40.62%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
61.73M
KGLLF
Price
$0.10
Change
+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Updated
Jul 30 closing price
Capitalization
56.63M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FPRGF vs KGLLF

Header iconFPRGF vs KGLLF Comparison
Open Charts FPRGF vs KGLLFBanner chart's image
Falco Resources
Price$0.19
Change-$0.13 (-40.62%)
Volume$19.42K
Capitalization61.73M
KGL Resources
Price$0.10
Change+$0.04 (+66.67%)
Volume$34.5K
Capitalization56.63M
FPRGF vs KGLLF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FPRGF vs. KGLLF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FPRGF is a Hold and KGLLF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FPRGF: $0.19 vs. KGLLF: $0.10)
Brand notoriety: FPRGF and KGLLF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FPRGF: 129% vs. KGLLF: 153%
Market capitalization -- FPRGF: $61.73M vs. KGLLF: $56.63M
FPRGF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $61.73M. KGLLF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $56.63M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FPRGF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileKGLLF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FPRGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • KGLLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FPRGF and KGLLF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FPRGF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KGLLF’s TA Score has 0 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FPRGF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KGLLF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FPRGF is a better buy in the short-term than KGLLF.

Price Growth

FPRGF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а -8.96% price change this week, while KGLLF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.77%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.56%, and the average quarterly price growth was +121.49%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.77% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FPRGF($61.7M) has a higher market cap than KGLLF($56.6M). KGLLF YTD gains are higher at: 74.333 vs. FPRGF (0.000). FPRGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 266K vs. KGLLF (-3.43M).
FPRGFKGLLFFPRGF / KGLLF
Capitalization61.7M56.6M109%
EBITDA266K-3.43M-8%
Gain YTD0.00074.333-
P/E Ratio28.28N/A-
Revenue0N/A-
Total Cash2.79MN/A-
Total Debt36.8MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FPRGF: Fundamental Ratings
FPRGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
91
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
36
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
38
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FPRGFKGLLF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
89%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
17%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FPRGF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KGLLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BKHYY96.610.57
+0.60%
Bank Hapoalim B.M.
RNWEF0.19N/A
N/A
REC SILICON ASA
PEMIF0.13N/A
-0.52%
Pure Energy Minerals Ltd.
SLFPF2.53-0.03
-0.98%
ABERDEEN GROUP PLC
IDRSF3.30-0.04
-1.20%
Idorsia AG

FPRGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FPRGF and DCNNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FPRGF and DCNNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FPRGF
1D Price
Change %
FPRGF100%
-40.63%
DCNNF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
-18.75%
CVWFF - FPRGF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KGLLF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CASXF - FPRGF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ATBHF - FPRGF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

KGLLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KGLLF has been loosely correlated with MKRIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KGLLF jumps, then MKRIF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KGLLF
1D Price
Change %
KGLLF100%
N/A
MKRIF - KGLLF
41%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ULTHF - KGLLF
26%
Poorly correlated
+13.11%
FPRGF - KGLLF
24%
Poorly correlated
-40.63%
RGLSF - KGLLF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
EULIF - KGLLF
9%
Poorly correlated
-7.62%
More