Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs MMHEX
FQCHX vs MMHEX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs MMHEX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.98M
NYLI MacKay High Yield Muni Bond Cl R6
Price$11.27
Change-$0.04 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.18B
FQCHX vs MMHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. MMHEX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and MMHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MMHEX has more cash in the bank: 9.18B vs. FQCHX (27M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than MMHEX: FQCHX (5.54) vs MMHEX (4.44). FQCHX was incepted earlier than MMHEX: FQCHX (6 years) vs MMHEX (6 years). MMHEX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. MMHEX (17.00). FQCHX (0) and MMHEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. MMHEX (-1.88). MMHEX return over 5 years is better than : 6.12 vs. FQCHX (1.99).
| FQCHX | MMHEX | FQCHX / MMHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.333 | -2.990 | 78% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27M | 9.18B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 4.44 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -1.88 | -14% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 8.52 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | 6.12 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement