Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs MMHEX
FQCHX vs MMHEX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs MMHEX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
NYLI MacKay High Yield Muni Bond Cl R6
Price$11.69
Change+$0.03 (+0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets9.27B
FQCHX vs MMHEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. MMHEX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and MMHEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQCHX pays higher dividends than MMHEX: FQCHX (5.63) vs MMHEX (4.50). FQCHX was incepted earlier than MMHEX: FQCHX (6 years) vs MMHEX (6 years). MMHEX (0.57) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. MMHEX (17.00). FQCHX (0) and MMHEX (0) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MMHEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.49 vs. FQCHX (-0.02). MMHEX return over 5 years is better than : 10.44 vs. FQCHX (3.34).
| FQCHX | MMHEX | FQCHX / MMHEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.57 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 0.57 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.386 | 1.401 | 28% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 9.27B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.63 | 4.50 | 125% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | 0.49 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.52 | 17.44 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.34 | 10.44 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement