Ad is loading...
FQCHX vs NHCCX
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.76
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets29.44M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.57
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets14.52B
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHCCX commentary
Apr 03, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.5B vs. FQCHX (29.4M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQCHX (5.35) vs NHCCX (4.39). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHCCX (28.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQCHX (0) vs NHCCX (3000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.17 vs. NHCCX (2.67). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 16.84 vs. FQCHX (13.19).
| FQCHX | NHCCX | FQCHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 2.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 2.91 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.084 | -0.212 | -39% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 29.4M | 14.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.35 | 4.39 | 122% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.17 | 2.67 | 306% |
| Returns for 3 years | 3.36 | -1.78 | -189% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.19 | 16.84 | 78% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.73 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...