Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs NHCCX
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.40
Change-$0.03 (-0.36%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets26.98M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$13.75
Change-$0.09 (-0.65%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.25B
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jul 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.2B vs. FQCHX (27M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQCHX (5.54) vs NHCCX (4.57). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). NHCCX (2.91) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHCCX (18.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQCHX (0) vs NHCCX (3000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.27 vs. NHCCX (-5.38). FQCHX return over 5 years is better than : 1.99 vs. NHCCX (0.45).
| FQCHX | NHCCX | FQCHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 2.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 2.91 | 17% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.333 | -4.101 | 57% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27M | 13.2B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.54 | 4.57 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.27 | -5.38 | -5% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.15 | 0.41 | 1,982% |
| Returns for 5 years | 1.99 | 0.45 | 446% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 13.00 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement