Ad is loading...
FQCHX vs NHCCX
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.87
Change-$0.01 (-0.11%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.77
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
VolumeN/A
CapitalizationN/A
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHCCX commentary
Jan 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 14.8B vs. FQCHX (27.8M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQCHX (4.89) vs NHCCX (4.42). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (11 years). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 45.25 vs. NHCCX (43.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQCHX (0) vs NHCCX (3000). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.99 vs. NHCCX (4.36). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 0.64 vs. FQCHX (0.28).
| FQCHX | NHCCX | FQCHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.000 | 0.068 | - |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 3000 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 27.8M | 14.8B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 4.89 | 4.42 | 111% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.99 | 4.36 | 183% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.12 | -8.21 | 62% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.28 | 0.64 | 45% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.45 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers