Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs NHCCX
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets32.06M
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.48
Change+$0.01 (+0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets13.14B
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHCCX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NHCCX has more cash in the bank: 13.1B vs. FQCHX (32.1M). FQCHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQCHX (5.50) vs NHCCX (4.52). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHCCX (18.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQCHX (0) vs NHCCX (200). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.74 vs. NHCCX (1.06). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 6.86 vs. FQCHX (5.40).
| FQCHX | NHCCX | FQCHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 2.80 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 2.80 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.767 | 1.475 | 120% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 200 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 32.1M | 13.1B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.50 | 4.52 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.74 | 1.06 | 163% |
| Returns for 3 years | 23.41 | 17.37 | 135% |
| Returns for 5 years | 5.40 | 6.86 | 79% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 18.52 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement