Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQCHX vs NHCCX
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison
Open Charts FQCHX vs NHCCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series CH Adv
Price$8.60
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
VolumeN/A
Net AssetsN/A
Nuveen High Yield Municipal Bond C
Price$14.34
Change+$0.03 (+0.21%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets12.58B
FQCHX vs NHCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQCHX vs. NHCCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQCHX is a Hold and NHCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQCHX pays higher dividends than NHCCX: FQCHX (5.63) vs NHCCX (4.69). FQCHX was incepted earlier than NHCCX: FQCHX (6 years) vs NHCCX (12 years). NHCCX (2.80) is less costly to investors than FQCHX (0.50). FQCHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 38.97 vs. NHCCX (18.00). FQCHX has a lower initial minimum investment than NHCCX: FQCHX (0) vs NHCCX (200). FQCHX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.02 vs. NHCCX (-1.99). NHCCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.89 vs. FQCHX (3.34).
| FQCHX | NHCCX | FQCHX / NHCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 2.80 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.50 | 2.80 | 18% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.386 | -0.037 | -1,030% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 200 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | N/A | 12.6B | - |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.63 | 4.69 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.02 | -1.99 | 1% |
| Returns for 3 years | 14.52 | 8.26 | 176% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.34 | 4.89 | 68% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 17.44 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement