Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQLAX vs FRORX
FQLAX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FQLAX vs FRORX
Franklin Louisiana Tax Free Income A
Price$9.87
Change+$0.01 (+0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets227.11M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A1
Price$10.14
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets802.13M
FQLAX vs FRORX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQLAX vs. FRORX commentary
Jul 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQLAX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 802M vs. FQLAX (227M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FQLAX: FRORX (3.41) vs FQLAX (2.93). FQLAX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FQLAX (7 years) vs FRORX (38 years). FQLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FRORX (0.67). FQLAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FRORX (11.31). FQLAX (4%) and FRORX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQLAX (1000) and FRORX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.03 vs. FQLAX (-0.23). FQLAX return over 5 years is better than : -3.61 vs. FRORX (-4.93).
| FQLAX | FRORX | FQLAX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.612 | -1.387 | 116% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 227M | 802M | 28% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.93 | 3.41 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.23 | 0.03 | -663% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.01 | 3.72 | 108% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.61 | -4.93 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -1.67 | - |