Ad is loading...
FQLAX vs FRORX
FQLAX vs FRORX Comparison
Open Charts FQLAX vs FRORX
Franklin Louisiana Tax Free Income A
Price$9.91
Change+$0.04 (+0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets234.12M
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A1
Price$10.17
Change+$0.04 (+0.39%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets811.41M
FQLAX vs FRORX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQLAX vs. FRORX commentary
May 01, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQLAX is a Hold and FRORX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRORX has more cash in the bank: 811M vs. FQLAX (234M). FRORX pays higher dividends than FQLAX: FRORX (3.29) vs FQLAX (2.82). FQLAX was incepted earlier than FRORX: FQLAX (7 years) vs FRORX (38 years). FQLAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FRORX (0.67). FRORX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 15.03 vs. FQLAX (8.52). FQLAX (4%) and FRORX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. FQLAX (1000) and FRORX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. FRORX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.83 vs. FQLAX (0.65). FQLAX return over 5 years is better than : -2.61 vs. FRORX (-3.16).
| FQLAX | FRORX | FQLAX / FRORX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.67 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.363 | -2.357 | 100% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 234M | 811M | 29% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.29 | 86% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.65 | 0.83 | 78% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.01 | 1.55 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | -2.61 | -3.16 | 82% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | -3.54 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers