Ad is loading...
FQLAX vs MSNCX
FQLAX vs MSNCX Comparison
Open Charts FQLAX vs MSNCX
Franklin Louisiana Tax Free Income A
Price$9.82
Change+$0.05 (+0.51%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets232.42M
MFS NC Municipal Bond A
Price$10.44
Change+$0.04 (+0.38%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets439.8M
FQLAX vs MSNCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQLAX vs. MSNCX commentary
Apr 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQLAX is a Hold and MSNCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MSNCX has more cash in the bank: 440M vs. FQLAX (232M). MSNCX pays higher dividends than FQLAX: MSNCX (3.17) vs FQLAX (2.82). FQLAX was incepted earlier than MSNCX: FQLAX (7 years) vs MSNCX (41 years). FQLAX (0.90) and MSNCX (0.86) have similar cost to investors . MSNCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FQLAX (8.52). MSNCX initial investment is less costly to investors than FQLAX (4%) vs FQLAX (4%). FQLAX (1000) and MSNCX (1000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. MSNCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 0.28 vs. FQLAX (-0.34). MSNCX return over 5 years is better than : 4.31 vs. FQLAX (-3.85).
| FQLAX | MSNCX | FQLAX / MSNCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.84 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.86 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 7 years | 41 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.353 | -3.121 | 107% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 88% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 232M | 440M | 53% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.82 | 3.17 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.34 | 0.28 | -121% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.68 | 3.15 | 22% |
| Returns for 5 years | -3.85 | 4.31 | -89% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 9.27 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...