Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDAX
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDAX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.67M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$26.81
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.14B
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDAX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (406M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: FQTEX (6.15) vs RIDAX (2.98). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). RIDAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. RIDAX (11.01). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 71.78 vs. RIDAX (34.00).
| FQTEX | RIDAX | FQTEX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.36 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.110 | 11.651 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.15 | 2.98 | 206% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.78 | 11.01 | 125% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 19.51 | 164% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.78 | 34.00 | 211% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 44.88 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers