Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDAX
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDAX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.43
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets414.22M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R1
Price$27.04
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.82B
FQTEX vs RIDAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDAX commentary
Sep 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Buy and RIDAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDAX has more cash in the bank: 137B vs. FQTEX (414M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDAX: FQTEX (5.93) vs RIDAX (2.90). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDAX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDAX (23 years). RIDAX (1.36) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDAX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDAX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDAX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.88 vs. RIDAX (10.63). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 74.18 vs. RIDAX (35.28).
| FQTEX | RIDAX | FQTEX / RIDAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 1.36 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 1.36 | 8% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.944 | 12.609 | 103% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 414M | 137B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 5.93 | 2.90 | 204% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.88 | 10.63 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 43.83 | 27.32 | 160% |
| Returns for 5 years | 74.18 | 35.28 | 210% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 52.65 | - |