Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.39
Change+$0.03 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets405.67M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$26.89
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets136.14B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Aug 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Buy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 136B vs. FQTEX (406M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.15) vs RIDCX (3.39). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.78 vs. RIDCX (11.47). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 71.78 vs. RIDCX (36.31).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.110 | 11.945 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 406M | 136B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.15 | 3.39 | 181% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.78 | 11.47 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 31.91 | 20.89 | 153% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.78 | 36.31 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 48.19 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers