Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.95
Change-$0.10 (-0.77%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets365.49M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$26.15
Change-$0.14 (-0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets133.37B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Jun 14, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Buy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 133B vs. FQTEX (365M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.17) vs RIDCX (3.45). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). RIDCX (13.34) and FQTEX (12.71) have marching annual gain over last year. FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 73.73 vs. RIDCX (40.32).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.038 | 8.864 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 365M | 133B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.17 | 3.45 | 179% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.71 | 13.34 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.47 | 24.60 | 156% |
| Returns for 5 years | 73.73 | 40.32 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 40.97 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement