Ad is loading...
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$11.81
Change+$0.12 (+1.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets305.2M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$24.57
Change+$0.14 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets123.85B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Apr 18, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a StrongBuy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 124B vs. FQTEX (305M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.06) vs RIDCX (3.55). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). RIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.62 vs. FQTEX (4.40). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 61.50 vs. RIDCX (34.74).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -4.415 | 1.705 | -259% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 305M | 124B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.06 | 3.55 | 171% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.40 | 9.62 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 10.64 | 5.96 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 61.50 | 34.74 | 177% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 29.77 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...