Ad is loading...
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$12.32
Change+$0.07 (+0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets324.2M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$25.30
Change+$0.01 (+0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets128.01B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a StrongBuy and RIDCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 128B vs. FQTEX (324M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.31) vs RIDCX (3.56). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX (93.40) and RIDCX (92.00) have comparable annual turnover. FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). RIDCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.76 vs. FQTEX (5.99). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 67.57 vs. RIDCX (39.36).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.91 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.91 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.748 | 4.727 | 16% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 324M | 128B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.31 | 3.56 | 177% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.99 | 9.76 | 61% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.59 | 14.81 | 166% |
| Returns for 5 years | 67.57 | 39.36 | 172% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 33.51 | - |