Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FQTEX vs RIDCX
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison
Open Charts FQTEX vs RIDCX
Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series E Adv
Price$13.43
Change-$0.02 (-0.15%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets448.71M
American Funds Income Fund of Amer R3
Price$27.22
Change-$0.02 (-0.07%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets137.8B
FQTEX vs RIDCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FQTEX vs. RIDCX commentary
Nov 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQTEX is a Hold and RIDCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RIDCX has more cash in the bank: 138B vs. FQTEX (449M). FQTEX pays higher dividends than RIDCX: FQTEX (6.39) vs RIDCX (3.29). FQTEX was incepted earlier than RIDCX: FQTEX (6 years) vs RIDCX (23 years). RIDCX (0.90) is less costly to investors than FQTEX (0.11). FQTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than RIDCX: FQTEX (0) vs RIDCX (250). FQTEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. RIDCX (9.53). FQTEX return over 5 years is better than : 64.50 vs. RIDCX (33.85).
| FQTEX | RIDCX | FQTEX / RIDCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.00 | 0.90 | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.11 | 0.90 | 12% |
| Fund Existence | 6 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.692 | 13.925 | 106% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 449M | 138B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 6.39 | 3.29 | 194% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.39 | 9.53 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.65 | 27.21 | 146% |
| Returns for 5 years | 64.50 | 33.85 | 191% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 51.75 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers