FQVTF
Price
$8.27
Change
+$0.01 (+0.12%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
LSDAF
Price
$124.59
Change
-$1.76 (-1.39%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

FQVTF vs LSDAF

Header iconFQVTF vs LSDAF Comparison
Open Charts FQVTF vs LSDAFBanner chart's image
Fevertree Drinks
Price$8.27
Change+$0.01 (+0.12%)
Volume$1.83K
CapitalizationN/A
Lassonde Industries
Price$124.59
Change-$1.76 (-1.39%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
FQVTF vs LSDAF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FQVTF vs. LSDAF commentary
Dec 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQVTF is a StrongSell and LSDAF is a Sell.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 23, 2024
Stock price -- (FQVTF: $8.27 vs. LSDAF: $124.59)
Brand notoriety: FQVTF and LSDAF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FQVTF: 23% vs. LSDAF: 103%
Market capitalization -- FQVTF: $2.01B vs. LSDAF: $769.76M
FQVTF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.01B. LSDAF’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $769.76M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FQVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLSDAF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FQVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • LSDAF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, LSDAF is a better buy in the long-term than FQVTF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FQVTF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LSDAF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FQVTF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • LSDAF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FQVTF is a better buy in the short-term than LSDAF.

Price Growth

FQVTF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -7.08% price change this week, while LSDAF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was -1.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.33%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (-1.85% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FQVTF($2.01B) has a higher market cap than LSDAF($770M). FQVTF has higher P/E ratio than LSDAF: FQVTF (65.79) vs LSDAF (13.58). LSDAF YTD gains are higher at: 21.161 vs. FQVTF (-39.942). LSDAF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 159M vs. FQVTF (52.7M). FQVTF has more cash in the bank: 100M vs. LSDAF (338K). FQVTF has less debt than LSDAF: FQVTF (2.7M) vs LSDAF (251M). LSDAF has higher revenues than FQVTF: LSDAF (2B) vs FQVTF (330M).
FQVTFLSDAFFQVTF / LSDAF
Capitalization2.01B770M261%
EBITDA52.7M159M33%
Gain YTD-39.94221.161-189%
P/E Ratio65.7913.58485%
Revenue330M2B17%
Total Cash100M338K29,586%
Total Debt2.7M251M1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVTF vs LSDAF: Fundamental Ratings
FQVTF
LSDAF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
37
Fair valued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10099
SMR RATING
1..100
5565
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8447
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9775
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a65

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

LSDAF's Valuation (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (37). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (100). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

FQVTF's SMR Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as LSDAF (65). This means that FQVTF’s stock grew similarly to LSDAF’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (84). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

LSDAF's P/E Growth Rating (75) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (97). This means that LSDAF’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FQVTFLSDAF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
36%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
44%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
37%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FQVTF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
LSDAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSVRF0.120.01
+5.80%
GUANAJUATO SILVER CO LTD
GIEZX13.670.07
+0.51%
GuideStone Funds International Eq Inv
AABFX13.900.06
+0.43%
Thrivent Balanced Income Plus A
JSEAX18.19-0.08
-0.44%
JPMorgan International Equity A
NSIVX10.64-0.32
-2.91%
North Square Altrinsic Intl Eq I

FQVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FQVTF and JSDA have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FQVTF and JSDA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVTF
1D Price
Change %
FQVTF100%
+0.12%
JSDA - FQVTF
9%
Poorly correlated
N/A
UPCHY - FQVTF
5%
Poorly correlated
+9.14%
YKLTY - FQVTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-1.05%
EMBVF - FQVTF
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
LSDAF - FQVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

LSDAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that LSDAF and SHOT have been poorly correlated (+11% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that LSDAF and SHOT's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To LSDAF
1D Price
Change %
LSDAF100%
N/A
SHOT - LSDAF
11%
Poorly correlated
+6.58%
FQVTF - LSDAF
3%
Poorly correlated
+0.12%
UPCHY - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
+9.14%
MOJO - LSDAF
2%
Poorly correlated
-2.68%
JSDA - LSDAF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More