FQVTF
Price
$9.46
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
UPCHY
Price
$95.94
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 4 closing price
Ad is loading...

FQVTF vs UPCHY

Header iconFQVTF vs UPCHY Comparison
Open Charts FQVTF vs UPCHYBanner chart's image
Fevertree Drinks
Price$9.46
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1K
CapitalizationN/A
Uni-President China Holdings
Price$95.94
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1
CapitalizationN/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
FQVTF vs UPCHY Comparison Chart
Loading...
VS
FQVTF vs. UPCHY commentary
Nov 06, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FQVTF is a Hold and UPCHY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 06, 2024
Stock price -- (FQVTF: $9.46 vs. UPCHY: $95.94)
Brand notoriety: FQVTF and UPCHY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FQVTF: 42% vs. UPCHY: 3%
Market capitalization -- FQVTF: $2.01B vs. UPCHY: $3.73B
FQVTF [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] is valued at $2.01B. UPCHY’s [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] market capitalization is $3.73B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry ranges from $263.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic] industry is $21.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FQVTF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileUPCHY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FQVTF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • UPCHY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, UPCHY is a better buy in the long-term than FQVTF.

Price Growth

FQVTF (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while UPCHY (@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic) price change was -5.95% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Beverages: Non-Alcoholic industry was +1.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.22%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Beverages: Non-Alcoholic (+1.28% weekly)

Non-alcoholic drinks include traces of alcohol or low alcohol content or without alcohol or alcohol removed. Functional Beverages, Carbonated Soft Drinks (CSDs), Sports Drinks, Fruit Beverages, and Bottled Water are some common types of non-alcoholic beverages. The largest segment in this market is soft drinks (think Pepsi and Coke). Many established companies in this space have also been stepping up production of low to zero-calorie varieties in recent years, to cater to a rising number of health-conscious consumers. Coca-Cola Company, Pepsico Inc, Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and Monster Beverage Corporation are some major non-alcoholic beverage makers.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UPCHY($3.73B) has a higher market cap than FQVTF($2.01B). FQVTF has higher P/E ratio than UPCHY: FQVTF (65.79) vs UPCHY (21.10). UPCHY YTD gains are higher at: 43.322 vs. FQVTF (-31.300). UPCHY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.93B vs. FQVTF (52.7M). UPCHY has higher revenues than FQVTF: UPCHY (28.3B) vs FQVTF (330M).
FQVTFUPCHYFQVTF / UPCHY
Capitalization2.01B3.73B54%
EBITDA52.7M2.93B2%
Gain YTD-31.30043.322-72%
P/E Ratio65.7921.10312%
Revenue330M28.3B1%
Total Cash100MN/A-
Total Debt2.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FQVTF vs UPCHY: Fundamental Ratings
FQVTF
UPCHY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8033
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
41
Fair valued
7
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10076
SMR RATING
1..100
5618
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8340
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9640
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

UPCHY's Valuation (7) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (41). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Profit vs Risk Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as FQVTF (100). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew similarly to FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's SMR Rating (18) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (56). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (83). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

UPCHY's P/E Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FQVTF (96). This means that UPCHY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FQVTF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KGGAX12.620.08
+0.64%
Kopernik Global All-Cap A
REMYX17.060.06
+0.35%
Russell Inv Emerging Markets Y
GFSIX15.83N/A
N/A
Gabelli Global Financial Services I
MIGMX33.91-0.01
-0.03%
MFS Massachusetts Inv Gr Stk R1
LBWCX21.87-0.08
-0.36%
BrandywineGLOBAL Div US Large Value C

FQVTF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FQVTF and JSDA have been poorly correlated (+9% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FQVTF and JSDA's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FQVTF
1D Price
Change %
FQVTF100%
-0.79%
JSDA - FQVTF
9%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
UPCHY - FQVTF
5%
Poorly correlated
-5.95%
YKLTY - FQVTF
5%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
EMBVF - FQVTF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LSDAF - FQVTF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

UPCHY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that UPCHY and YNAJF have been poorly correlated (+10% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that UPCHY and YNAJF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UPCHY
1D Price
Change %
UPCHY100%
-5.95%
YNAJF - UPCHY
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FQVTF - UPCHY
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.79%
JSDA - UPCHY
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.23%
LSDAF - UPCHY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
YKLTY - UPCHY
1%
Poorly correlated
+1.11%
More