Advertisement
FR vs LXP
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FR is a Hold and LXP is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
FR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLXP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- FR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LXP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
FR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LXP’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- FR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LXP’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
FR (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while LXP (@Miscellaneous Manufacturing) price change was +1.73% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Manufacturing industry was +0.35%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.00%.
Reported Earning Dates
FR is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2025.
LXP is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Miscellaneous Manufacturing (+0.35% weekly)Miscellaneous manufacturing refers to a diverse range of products that cannot readily be categorized into other specific sectors of manufacturing. Major U.S. players in this industry include AMETEK, Inc.( analytical instruments, precision components and specialty materials), Dover Corporation (solutions for efficiency and safety of extracting oil and gas, e.g. rod lifts, progressing cavity pumps, gas lifts etc.; solutions for the transportation/transformation of solid waste; products for safe handling of critical fluids for various industries; systems for commercial-refrigeration, heating and cooling, and food and beverage packaging), and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (niche markets including commercial roofing, energy, lawn and garden, mining and construction equipment, aerospace and electronics, dining and food delivery, and healthcare), among others.
| FR | LXP | FR / LXP | |
| Capitalization | 6.42B | 2.43B | 264% |
| EBITDA | 556M | 153M | 363% |
| Gain YTD | -1.507 | 4.616 | -33% |
| P/E Ratio | 23.67 | 30.48 | 78% |
| Revenue | 700M | 363M | 193% |
| Total Cash | 34.9M | 71M | 49% |
| Total Debt | 2.41B | 1.41B | 171% |
FR | LXP | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 77 | 61 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 44 Fair valued | 5 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 58 | 98 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 85 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 75 | 59 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 98 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 65 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LXP's Valuation (5) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FR (44). This means that LXP’s stock grew somewhat faster than FR’s over the last 12 months.
FR's Profit vs Risk Rating (58) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LXP (98). This means that FR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LXP’s over the last 12 months.
FR's SMR Rating (68) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as LXP (85). This means that FR’s stock grew similarly to LXP’s over the last 12 months.
LXP's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as FR (75). This means that LXP’s stock grew similarly to FR’s over the last 12 months.
FR's P/E Growth Rating (62) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LXP (98). This means that FR’s stock grew somewhat faster than LXP’s over the last 12 months.
| FR | LXP | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 48% | 1 day ago 57% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 43% | 1 day ago 55% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 55% | 1 day ago 59% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 47% | 1 day ago 58% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 54% | 3 days ago 55% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 48% | 15 days ago 61% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 57% | 1 day ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% | 1 day ago 59% |
Advertisement
LXP and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LXP has been closely correlated with STAG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if LXP jumps, then STAG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LXP | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LXP | 100% | -0.36% | ||
| STAG - LXP | 83% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| FR - LXP | 82% Closely correlated | -1.02% | ||
| EGP - LXP | 81% Closely correlated | -1.39% | ||
| PLYM - LXP | 78% Closely correlated | -1.13% | ||
| PLD - LXP | 77% Closely correlated | -0.32% | ||
More | ||||