FRACF
Price
$1.38
Change
+$0.02 (+1.47%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
134.72M
FSUGY
Price
$25.60
Change
+$0.29 (+1.15%)
Updated
Aug 22 closing price
Capitalization
38.64B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs FSUGY

Header iconFRACF vs FSUGY Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs FSUGYBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.38
Change+$0.02 (+1.47%)
Volume$600
Capitalization134.72M
FORTESCUE
Price$25.60
Change+$0.29 (+1.15%)
Volume$40.51K
Capitalization38.64B
FRACF vs FSUGY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. FSUGY commentary
Aug 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Buy and FSUGY is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 25, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.38 vs. FSUGY: $25.60)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and FSUGY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 35% vs. FSUGY: 58%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $134.72M vs. FSUGY: $38.64B
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $134.72M. FSUGY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $38.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.23B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFSUGY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FSUGY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the long-term than FRACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSUGY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • FSUGY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSUGY is a better buy in the short-term than FRACF.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +9.09% price change this week, while FSUGY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +0.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.32%, and the average quarterly price growth was +77.51%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+0.81% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSUGY($38.6B) has a higher market cap than FRACF($135M). FSUGY has higher P/E ratio than FRACF: FSUGY (10.12) vs FRACF (7.21). FSUGY YTD gains are higher at: 17.065 vs. FRACF (-19.298). FRACF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 46.9M vs. FSUGY (-6.13M). FRACF has more cash in the bank: 20.8M vs. FSUGY (2.58M). FSUGY has less debt than FRACF: FSUGY (38.3M) vs FRACF (97.3M). FRACF has higher revenues than FSUGY: FRACF (263M) vs FSUGY (1.28M).
FRACFFSUGYFRACF / FSUGY
Capitalization135M38.6B0%
EBITDA46.9M-6.13M-765%
Gain YTD-19.29817.065-113%
P/E Ratio7.2110.1271%
Revenue263M1.28M20,595%
Total Cash20.8M2.58M805%
Total Debt97.3M38.3M254%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs FSUGY: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
FSUGY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2569
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4758
SMR RATING
1..100
4266
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5845
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2614
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5049

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FSUGY's Valuation (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRACF (70). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (58). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's SMR Rating (42) in the null industry is in the same range as FSUGY (66). This means that FRACF’s stock grew similarly to FSUGY’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (58). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FSUGY's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (26). This means that FSUGY’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFFSUGY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
72%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSUGY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DMXCF0.830.10
+14.46%
District Metals Corp.
ETCMY0.920.02
+1.94%
Eutelsat Communications
BACHY14.260.15
+1.06%
Bank of China, Ltd.
CPCAY6.89-0.14
-1.99%
Cathay Pacific Airways, Ltd.
KTEL0.34-0.01
-2.14%
KonaTel, Inc.

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and SMMYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and SMMYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
+1.47%
SMMYY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.37%
FSUGY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.15%
FSUMF - FRACF
19%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
FWEDF - FRACF
8%
Poorly correlated
+0.06%
GARWF - FRACF
4%
Poorly correlated
-9.40%
More

FSUGY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSUGY has been closely correlated with BHP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 73% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FSUGY jumps, then BHP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSUGY
1D Price
Change %
FSUGY100%
+1.15%
BHP - FSUGY
73%
Closely correlated
+2.66%
RIO - FSUGY
72%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
FSUMF - FSUGY
68%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
VALE - FSUGY
62%
Loosely correlated
+3.16%
GLNCY - FSUGY
55%
Loosely correlated
+0.76%
More