FRACF
Price
$1.49
Change
-$0.07 (-4.49%)
Updated
Oct 31 closing price
Capitalization
143.03M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SMMYY
Price
$7.67
Change
-$0.39 (-4.84%)
Updated
Nov 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.39B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRACF vs SMMYY

Header iconFRACF vs SMMYY Comparison
Open Charts FRACF vs SMMYYBanner chart's image
Foraco International, Marseille
Price$1.49
Change-$0.07 (-4.49%)
Volume$100
Capitalization143.03M
Sumitomo Metal Mining
Price$7.67
Change-$0.39 (-4.84%)
Volume$71.93K
Capitalization8.39B
FRACF vs SMMYY Comparison Chart in %
FRACF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMMYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRACF vs. SMMYY commentary
Nov 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRACF is a Hold and SMMYY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FRACF: $1.49 vs. SMMYY: $7.67)
Brand notoriety: FRACF and SMMYY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRACF: 2% vs. SMMYY: 106%
Market capitalization -- FRACF: $143.03M vs. SMMYY: $8.39B
FRACF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $143.03M. SMMYY’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $8.39B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRACF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMMYY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRACF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMMYY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMMYY is a better buy in the long-term than FRACF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRACF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMMYY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRACF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SMMYY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRACF is a better buy in the short-term than SMMYY.

Price Growth

FRACF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SMMYY (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -5.19% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was +98.95%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (-1.01% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SMMYY($8.39B) has a higher market cap than FRACF($143M). SMMYY has higher P/E ratio than FRACF: SMMYY (53.38) vs FRACF (9.30). SMMYY YTD gains are higher at: 35.512 vs. FRACF (-12.865). SMMYY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 204B vs. FRACF (44.9M). SMMYY has more cash in the bank: 177B vs. FRACF (24.9M). FRACF has less debt than SMMYY: FRACF (97.2M) vs SMMYY (583B). SMMYY has higher revenues than FRACF: SMMYY (1.53T) vs FRACF (256M).
FRACFSMMYYFRACF / SMMYY
Capitalization143M8.39B2%
EBITDA44.9M204B0%
Gain YTD-12.86535.512-36%
P/E Ratio9.3053.3817%
Revenue256M1.53T0%
Total Cash24.9M177B0%
Total Debt97.2M583B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRACF vs SMMYY: Fundamental Ratings
FRACF
SMMYY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4474
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
70
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4791
SMR RATING
1..100
485
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5443
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
114
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMMYY's Valuation (17) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRACF (70). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

FRACF's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMMYY (91). This means that FRACF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMMYY’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's SMR Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRACF (48). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (54). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

SMMYY's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the null industry is in the same range as FRACF (11). This means that SMMYY’s stock grew similarly to FRACF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRACFSMMYY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRACF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SMMYY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSEW82.330.01
+0.01%
Goldman Sachs Equal Wght US Lg Cp Eq ETF
JPI20.68N/A
N/A
Nuveen Preferred Securities & Income Opportunities Fund
FCFY26.59N/A
N/A
First Trust S&P 500 Div Fr CA Flw ETF
AVEE62.78-0.29
-0.46%
Avantis Emerging Markets Sm Cp Eq ETF
AFOS31.97-0.31
-0.97%
ARS Focused Opportunities Strategy ETF

FRACF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRACF and SMMYY have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRACF and SMMYY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRACF
1D Price
Change %
FRACF100%
N/A
SMMYY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-4.78%
FSUGY - FRACF
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.29%
FSUMF - FRACF
19%
Poorly correlated
-0.72%
FWEDF - FRACF
8%
Poorly correlated
-1.99%
GARWF - FRACF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SMMYY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMMYY has been loosely correlated with SOUHY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SMMYY jumps, then SOUHY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMMYY
1D Price
Change %
SMMYY100%
-4.78%
SOUHY - SMMYY
40%
Loosely correlated
-1.46%
BDNNY - SMMYY
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.44%
GLNCY - SMMYY
37%
Loosely correlated
-2.65%
IVPAF - SMMYY
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.14%
BHP - SMMYY
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.61%
More