FRAF
Price
$36.45
Change
-$0.50 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
FUNC
Price
$29.50
Change
+$0.08 (+0.27%)
Updated
Jun 5 closing price
Capitalization
152.19M
52 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FUNC

Header iconFRAF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$36.45
Change-$0.50 (-1.35%)
Volume$14.97K
Capitalization113.45M
First United
Price$29.50
Change+$0.08 (+0.27%)
Volume$11.14K
Capitalization152.19M
FRAF vs FUNC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FUNC commentary
Jun 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Buy and FUNC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $36.50 vs. FUNC: $29.50)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 84% vs. FUNC: 58%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. FUNC: $152.19M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $152.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.46% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.43%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRAF is expected to report earnings on Mar 14, 2025.

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.53% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($152M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). FUNC has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: FUNC (10.14) vs FRAF (8.33). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 24.206 vs. FUNC (-11.206). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 86.9M vs. FRAF (20.1M). FUNC has less debt than FRAF: FUNC (112M) vs FRAF (154M). FUNC has higher revenues than FRAF: FUNC (71.3M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
FRAFFUNCFRAF / FUNC
Capitalization113M152M74%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD24.206-11.206-216%
P/E Ratio8.3310.1482%
Revenue67.3M71.3M94%
Total Cash20.1M86.9M23%
Total Debt154M112M138%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5158
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
49
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2836
SMR RATING
1..100
1716
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4957
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1263
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
75n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (59). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (36). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (17). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (57). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FUNC (63). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 29 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AMRAX6.37N/A
N/A
American Growth One A
JMIEX34.13N/A
N/A
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity L
HFECX52.89N/A
N/A
Janus Henderson European Focus C
FALGX50.74N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap M
LAMGX16.26N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett Micro Cap Growth A

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
-1.22%
FUNC - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
FCCO - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.13%
MRBK - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
HTB - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
WNEB - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.65%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with HTBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then HTBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
+0.27%
HTBK - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.32%
EFSC - FUNC
66%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
PNFP - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.26%
UCB - FUNC
66%
Loosely correlated
+0.17%
SHBI - FUNC
65%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
More