FRAF
Price
$44.50
Change
+$0.15 (+0.34%)
Updated
Oct 21, 04:00 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
198.54M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
FUNC
Price
$36.17
Change
+$1.58 (+4.57%)
Updated
Oct 21, 12:31 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
224.65M
6 days until earnings call
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FUNC

Header iconFRAF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$44.50
Change+$0.15 (+0.34%)
Volume$100
Capitalization198.54M
First United
Price$36.17
Change+$1.58 (+4.57%)
Volume$240
Capitalization224.65M
FRAF vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FUNC commentary
Oct 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Buy and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 21, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $44.35 vs. FUNC: $34.59)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 115% vs. FUNC: 105%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $198.54M vs. FUNC: $224.65M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $198.54M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $224.65M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $175.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than FUNC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than FUNC.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.94% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.34% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +4.88%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.49%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+4.88% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($225M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($199M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: FRAF (13.52) vs FUNC (9.48). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 52.167 vs. FUNC (5.591). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 77.3M vs. FRAF (23.3M). FUNC has less debt than FRAF: FUNC (151M) vs FRAF (224M). FUNC has higher revenues than FRAF: FUNC (83.7M) vs FRAF (76.1M).
FRAFFUNCFRAF / FUNC
Capitalization199M225M88%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD52.1675.591933%
P/E Ratio13.529.48143%
Revenue76.1M83.7M91%
Total Cash23.3M77.3M30%
Total Debt224M151M148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
89
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
53
Fair valued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1329
SMR RATING
1..100
5144
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4854
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1686
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
2012

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (33) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (53). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (29). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FUNC's SMR Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (51). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (54). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is significantly better than the same rating for FUNC (86). This means that FRAF’s stock grew significantly faster than FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
46%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HENOY21.000.16
+0.74%
Henkel AG & Co. KGAA
HKMPF23.98N/A
N/A
Hikma Pharmaceuticals plc.
IDRSF5.82N/A
N/A
Idorsia AG
CDOAF5.50N/A
N/A
CDON AB
ANORF0.04N/A
N/A
ANORTECH INC