FRAF
Price
$46.66
Change
+$0.11 (+0.24%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
208.88M
FUNC
Price
$37.27
Change
-$0.05 (-0.13%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
242.09M
59 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs FUNC

Header iconFRAF vs FUNC Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs FUNCBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$46.66
Change+$0.11 (+0.24%)
Volume$22.95K
Capitalization208.88M
First United
Price$37.27
Change-$0.05 (-0.13%)
Volume$11.49K
Capitalization242.09M
FRAF vs FUNC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. FUNC commentary
Aug 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Buy and FUNC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $46.66 vs. FUNC: $37.28)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and FUNC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 62% vs. FUNC: 27%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $208.88M vs. FUNC: $242.09M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $208.88M. FUNC’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $242.09M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $167.72B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.85B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFUNC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FUNC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the long-term than FRAF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FUNC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FUNC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FUNC is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +9.76% price change this week, while FUNC (@Regional Banks) price change was +8.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.27%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

FUNC is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.27% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FUNC($242M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($209M). FRAF has higher P/E ratio than FUNC: FRAF (14.23) vs FUNC (10.21). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 60.093 vs. FUNC (12.920). FUNC has more cash in the bank: 82.8M vs. FRAF (23.3M). FUNC has less debt than FRAF: FUNC (151M) vs FRAF (224M). FUNC has higher revenues than FRAF: FUNC (83.7M) vs FRAF (76.1M).
FRAFFUNCFRAF / FUNC
Capitalization209M242M86%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD60.09312.920465%
P/E Ratio14.2310.21139%
Revenue76.1M83.7M91%
Total Cash23.3M82.8M28%
Total Debt224M151M148%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs FUNC: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
FUNC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1075
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
55
Fair valued
38
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1325
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4144
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FUNC's Valuation (38) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (55). This means that FUNC’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (13) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (25). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (44). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FUNC (100). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to FUNC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFFUNC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FUNC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DLMAF134.491.40
+1.05%
Dollarama, Inc.
MTPOY27.30N/A
N/A
Metropolitan Bank & Trust
LRCDF22.86-0.04
-0.17%
Laurentian Bank of Canada
ELRRF0.81-0.01
-1.22%
Eloro Resources Ltd.
ZTSTF0.18N/A
-2.70%
ZTEST Electronics, Inc.

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with WNEB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then WNEB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.24%
WNEB - FRAF
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
FUNC - FRAF
47%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
MRBK - FRAF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CWBC - FRAF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
UBFO - FRAF
42%
Loosely correlated
-0.21%
More

FUNC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FUNC has been closely correlated with FNB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FUNC jumps, then FNB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FUNC
1D Price
Change %
FUNC100%
-0.15%
FNB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.48%
CWBC - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-1.08%
UCB - FUNC
68%
Closely correlated
-0.56%
SHBI - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.06%
WTFC - FUNC
67%
Closely correlated
+0.33%
More