FRAF
Price
$33.40
Change
+$0.19 (+0.57%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
KLIB
Price
$139.99
Change
+$31.99 (+29.62%)
Updated
Jan 6 closing price
Capitalization
66.89M
Ad is loading...

FRAF vs KLIB

Header iconFRAF vs KLIB Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs KLIBBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$33.40
Change+$0.19 (+0.57%)
Volume$14.19K
Capitalization113.45M
Killbuck Bancshares
Price$139.99
Change+$31.99 (+29.62%)
Volume$10
Capitalization66.89M
FRAF vs KLIB Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. KLIB commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Hold and KLIB is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $33.40 vs. KLIB: $139.99)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and KLIB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 223% vs. KLIB: 8%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. KLIB: $66.89M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. KLIB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $66.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKLIB’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KLIB’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than KLIB.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KLIB’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • KLIB’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KLIB is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +18.95% price change this week, while KLIB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRAF is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRAF($113M) has a higher market cap than KLIB($66.9M). KLIB YTD gains are higher at: 29.620 vs. FRAF (11.706). KLIB has less debt than FRAF: KLIB (1.92M) vs FRAF (154M). FRAF has higher revenues than KLIB: FRAF (67.3M) vs KLIB (12.7M).
FRAFKLIBFRAF / KLIB
Capitalization113M66.9M169%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.70629.62040%
P/E Ratio8.33N/A-
Revenue67.3M12.7M530%
Total Cash20.1MN/A-
Total Debt154M1.92M8,004%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs KLIB: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
KLIB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7550
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
76
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
4253
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4439
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5329
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (32) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KLIB (76) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KLIB (100) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as KLIB (53) in the null industry. This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to KLIB’s over the last 12 months.

KLIB's Price Growth Rating (39) in the null industry is in the same range as FRAF (44) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KLIB’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

KLIB's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as FRAF (53) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that KLIB’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFKLIB
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
27%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
54%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
50%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
47%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KLIB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCSO21.01N/A
N/A
Carbon Collective Climate Sol US Eq ETF
BIFI.X319.557860-12.025330
-3.63%
Beefy cryptocurrency
POLYX.X0.275568-0.013420
-4.64%
Polymesh cryptocurrency
MKR.X1379.243000-86.011350
-5.87%
Maker cryptocurrency
RARE.X0.104827-0.008028
-7.11%
SuperRare cryptocurrency

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with ORRF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then ORRF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+0.57%
ORRF - FRAF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
FUNC - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.37%
MRBK - FRAF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
CHMG - FRAF
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.96%
FCCO - FRAF
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
More

KLIB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KLIB has been loosely correlated with BBD. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if KLIB jumps, then BBD could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KLIB
1D Price
Change %
KLIB100%
N/A
BBD - KLIB
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
FRAF - KLIB
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.57%
KMERF - KLIB
28%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NBNKF - KLIB
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.87%
PWBK - KLIB
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More