FRAF
Price
$45.91
Change
-$0.43 (-0.93%)
Updated
Sep 30, 02:19 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
214.3M
MOFG
Price
$28.00
Change
-$0.46 (-1.62%)
Updated
Sep 30, 03:45 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
596.75M
23 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs MOFG

Header iconFRAF vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs MOFGBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$45.91
Change-$0.43 (-0.93%)
Volume$100
Capitalization214.3M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$28.00
Change-$0.46 (-1.62%)
Volume$200
Capitalization596.75M
FRAF vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. MOFG commentary
Sep 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a StrongBuy and MOFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 30, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $46.33 vs. MOFG: $28.46)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 81% vs. MOFG: 57%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $214.3M vs. MOFG: $596.75M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $214.3M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $596.75M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $163.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.87B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MOFG is a better buy in the short-term than FRAF.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -5.12% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.64%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.45%.

Reported Earning Dates

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.64% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($597M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($214M). FRAF (14.59) and MOFG (14.48) have similar P/E ratio . FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 58.961 vs. MOFG (0.159). MOFG has more cash in the bank: 78.7M vs. FRAF (23.3M). MOFG has less debt than FRAF: MOFG (112M) vs FRAF (224M). MOFG has higher revenues than FRAF: MOFG (84.7M) vs FRAF (76.1M).
FRAFMOFGFRAF / MOFG
Capitalization214M597M36%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD58.9610.15937,000%
P/E Ratio14.5914.48101%
Revenue76.1M84.7M90%
Total Cash23.3M78.7M30%
Total Debt224M112M200%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7552
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1451
SMR RATING
1..100
5168
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4260
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
159
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (58) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (91). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MOFG (51). This means that FRAF’s stock grew somewhat faster than MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's SMR Rating (51) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (68). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (60). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (15). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
60%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZLMY53.240.26
+0.49%
Swiss Life Holding
COIHF36.90N/A
N/A
Croda International Plc
SMSZF8.56N/A
N/A
SMS Co., Ltd.
ENZN0.08N/A
-0.07%
Enzon Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
BCHT0.74N/A
-0.37%
Birchtech Corp.