FRAF
Price
$38.50
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
113.45M
MOFG
Price
$30.07
Change
+$0.27 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jul 17 closing price
Capitalization
369.19M
6 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRAF vs MOFG

Header iconFRAF vs MOFG Comparison
Open Charts FRAF vs MOFGBanner chart's image
Franklin Financial Services
Price$38.50
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$225
Capitalization113.45M
MidWestOne Financial Gp
Price$30.07
Change+$0.27 (+0.91%)
Volume$80.73K
Capitalization369.19M
FRAF vs MOFG Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRAF vs. MOFG commentary
Jul 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRAF is a Hold and MOFG is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 18, 2025
Stock price -- (FRAF: $39.12 vs. MOFG: $30.07)
Brand notoriety: FRAF and MOFG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRAF: 102% vs. MOFG: 62%
Market capitalization -- FRAF: $113.45M vs. MOFG: $369.19M
FRAF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $113.45M. MOFG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $369.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRAF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMOFG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRAF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MOFG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the long-term than MOFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRAF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MOFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRAF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MOFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRAF is a better buy in the short-term than MOFG.

Price Growth

FRAF (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.54% price change this week, while MOFG (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.70%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRAF is expected to report earnings on May 15, 2025.

MOFG is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MOFG($369M) has a higher market cap than FRAF($113M). MOFG has higher P/E ratio than FRAF: MOFG (17.17) vs FRAF (8.33). FRAF YTD gains are higher at: 33.121 vs. MOFG (4.977). MOFG has more cash in the bank: 71M vs. FRAF (20.1M). FRAF has less debt than MOFG: FRAF (154M) vs MOFG (418M). MOFG has higher revenues than FRAF: MOFG (163M) vs FRAF (67.3M).
FRAFMOFGFRAF / MOFG
Capitalization113M369M31%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD33.1214.977666%
P/E Ratio8.3317.1749%
Revenue67.3M163M41%
Total Cash20.1M71M28%
Total Debt154M418M37%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRAF vs MOFG: Fundamental Ratings
FRAF
MOFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
313
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
60
Fair valued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2445
SMR RATING
1..100
4639
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4549
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
148
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a95

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRAF's Valuation (60) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (80). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Profit vs Risk Rating (24) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (45). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's SMR Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (46). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

FRAF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MOFG (49). This means that FRAF’s stock grew similarly to MOFG’s over the last 12 months.

MOFG's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRAF (14). This means that MOFG’s stock grew similarly to FRAF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRAFMOFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
53%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRAF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MOFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IAUFF0.20N/A
N/A
AIC Mines Ltd.
LSFG46.15N/A
N/A
Lifestore Financial Group, Inc.
CUAEF4.00N/A
N/A
China Shenhua Energy Co., Ltd.
YAMHF7.15N/A
N/A
Yamaha Motor Co., Ltd.
PALAF5.10-0.01
-0.27%
Paladin Energy Ltd.

FRAF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRAF has been loosely correlated with FUNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRAF jumps, then FUNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRAF
1D Price
Change %
FRAF100%
+1.61%
FUNC - FRAF
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.48%
MRBK - FRAF
43%
Loosely correlated
+1.71%
WNEB - FRAF
43%
Loosely correlated
+3.60%
FCCO - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.29%
MOFG - FRAF
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.91%
More

MOFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MOFG has been closely correlated with SFNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 87% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MOFG jumps, then SFNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MOFG
1D Price
Change %
MOFG100%
+0.91%
SFNC - MOFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
CAC - MOFG
87%
Closely correlated
+1.29%
TCBK - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
HBNC - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+1.53%
FFBC - MOFG
86%
Closely correlated
+0.48%
More