Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs LMRIX
FRBCX vs LMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs LMRIX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$27.76
Change-$0.24 (-0.86%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets841.41M
1919 Financial Services I
Price$30.51
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets116.87M
FRBCX vs LMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. LMRIX commentary
Oct 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Hold and LMRIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 841M vs. LMRIX (117M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than LMRIX: FRBCX (0.93) vs LMRIX (0.85). FRBCX was incepted earlier than LMRIX: FRBCX (27 years) vs LMRIX (18 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than LMRIX (1.21). LMRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRIX: FRBCX (1000) vs LMRIX (1000000). FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.96 vs. LMRIX (2.16). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 60.62 vs. LMRIX (38.12).
| FRBCX | LMRIX | FRBCX / LMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.21 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.21 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.504 | 3.845 | 143% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 841M | 117M | 719% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.93 | 0.85 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.96 | 2.16 | 323% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.03 | 12.49 | 96% |
| Returns for 5 years | 60.62 | 38.12 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 63.18 | 58.81 | 107% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement