Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBCX vs LMRIX
FRBCX vs LMRIX Comparison
Open Charts FRBCX vs LMRIX
JHancock Regional Bank C
Price$28.56
Change-$0.13 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets862.73M
1919 Financial Services I
Price$30.80
Change-$0.25 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets118.46M
FRBCX vs LMRIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBCX vs. LMRIX commentary
Sep 13, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBCX is a Buy and LMRIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRBCX has more cash in the bank: 863M vs. LMRIX (118M). FRBCX pays higher dividends than LMRIX: FRBCX (1.02) vs LMRIX (0.83). FRBCX was incepted earlier than LMRIX: FRBCX (27 years) vs LMRIX (17 years). FRBCX (1.97) is less costly to investors than LMRIX (1.21). LMRIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 4.00 vs. FRBCX (3.00). FRBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than LMRIX: FRBCX (1000) vs LMRIX (1000000). FRBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.27 vs. LMRIX (5.47). FRBCX return over 5 years is better than : 75.17 vs. LMRIX (47.41).
| FRBCX | LMRIX | FRBCX / LMRIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 1.21 | 162% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.21 | 163% |
| Fund Existence | 27 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.878 | 5.648 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 863M | 118M | 731% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.02 | 0.83 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.27 | 5.47 | 206% |
| Returns for 3 years | 9.83 | 8.99 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 75.17 | 47.41 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 65.76 | 64.46 | 102% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers