Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBRX vs FSPHX
FRBRX vs FSPHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBRX vs. FSPHX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBRX is a Hold and FSPHX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSPHX has more cash in the bank: 5.88B vs. FRBRX (793M). FSPHX pays higher dividends than FRBRX: FSPHX (0.02) vs FRBRX (0.00). FRBRX was incepted earlier than FSPHX: FRBRX (12 years) vs FSPHX (44 years). FRBRX (0.77) is less costly to investors than FSPHX (0.63). FSPHX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 40.00 vs. FRBRX (21.87). FSPHX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBRX: FSPHX (0) vs FRBRX (1000000). FRBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. FSPHX (-15.15). FRBRX (-11.06) and FSPHX (-11.50) have equivalent 5 years return.
| FRBRX | FSPHX | FRBRX / FSPHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 0.63 | 110% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 0.63 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 44 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.827 | -1.284 | -1,232% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 793M | 5.88B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.02 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.11 | -15.15 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | -1.95 | -1,784% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.06 | -11.50 | 96% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.06 | 19.31 | -119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement