Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRBRX vs SHSAX
FRBRX vs SHSAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRBRX vs. SHSAX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRBRX is a Hold and SHSAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SHSAX has more cash in the bank: 6.2B vs. FRBRX (793M). SHSAX pays higher dividends than FRBRX: SHSAX (0.23) vs FRBRX (0.00). FRBRX was incepted earlier than SHSAX: FRBRX (12 years) vs SHSAX (26 years). SHSAX (1.09) is less costly to investors than FRBRX (0.77). SHSAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 43.00 vs. FRBRX (21.87). SHSAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRBRX: SHSAX (1000) vs FRBRX (1000000). FRBRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -4.11 vs. SHSAX (-17.18). FRBRX return over 5 years is better than : -11.06 vs. SHSAX (-12.64).
| FRBRX | SHSAX | FRBRX / SHSAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.69 | 1.09 | 63% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.77 | 1.09 | 71% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 15.827 | -3.844 | -412% |
| Front Load | N/A | 5% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 793M | 6.2B | 13% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.23 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.11 | -17.18 | 24% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.82 | -1.47 | -2,374% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.06 | -12.64 | 87% |
| Returns for 10 years | -23.06 | 10.95 | -211% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement