FRCEF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.15 (+8.82%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
GCWOF
Price
$8.76
Change
-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Updated
Apr 7 closing price
Capitalization
3.19B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRCEF vs GCWOF

Header iconFRCEF vs GCWOF Comparison
Open Charts FRCEF vs GCWOFBanner chart's image
Fletcher Building
Price$1.85
Change+$0.15 (+8.82%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization2.69B
Grupo Cementos de Chihuahua SAB de CV
Price$8.76
Change-$0.39 (-4.26%)
Volume$2.96K
Capitalization3.19B
FRCEF vs GCWOF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCEF vs. GCWOF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCEF is a Hold and GCWOF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCEF: $1.85 vs. GCWOF: $8.76)
Brand notoriety: FRCEF and GCWOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCEF: 100% vs. GCWOF: 100%
Market capitalization -- FRCEF: $2.69B vs. GCWOF: $3.19B
FRCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.69B. GCWOF’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $3.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGCWOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GCWOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the long-term than FRCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRCEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GCWOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRCEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • GCWOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 0 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GCWOF is a better buy in the short-term than FRCEF.

Price Growth

FRCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while GCWOF (@Construction Materials) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GCWOF($3.19B) has a higher market cap than FRCEF($2.69B). FRCEF has higher P/E ratio than GCWOF: FRCEF (13.76) vs GCWOF (12.33). FRCEF YTD gains are higher at: 10.119 vs. GCWOF (0.114). FRCEF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1B vs. GCWOF (288M). GCWOF has more cash in the bank: 770M vs. FRCEF (351M). GCWOF has less debt than FRCEF: GCWOF (516M) vs FRCEF (2.7B). FRCEF has higher revenues than GCWOF: FRCEF (8.72B) vs GCWOF (1.25B).
FRCEFGCWOFFRCEF / GCWOF
Capitalization2.69B3.19B84%
EBITDA1B288M347%
Gain YTD10.1190.1148,854%
P/E Ratio13.7612.33112%
Revenue8.72B1.25B698%
Total Cash351M770M46%
Total Debt2.7B516M522%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCEF vs GCWOF: Fundamental Ratings
FRCEF
GCWOF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
73
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10050
SMR RATING
1..100
9651
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5461
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a30

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRCEF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for GCWOF (73). This means that FRCEF’s stock grew somewhat faster than GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCEF (100). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRCEF (96). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

FRCEF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as GCWOF (61). This means that FRCEF’s stock grew similarly to GCWOF’s over the last 12 months.

GCWOF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCEF (84). This means that GCWOF’s stock grew similarly to FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRCEFGCWOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
30%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
31%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GCWOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMGKX15.720.22
+1.42%
Fidelity Magellan K
CSMEX24.810.17
+0.69%
Carillon Scout Mid Cap A
WOOPX18.540.09
+0.49%
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity I
APDQX15.740.05
+0.32%
Artisan Mid Cap Value Advisor
RYCFX40.910.11
+0.27%
Rydex Biotechnology C

FRCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCEF and HLBZF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCEF and HLBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCEF
1D Price
Change %
FRCEF100%
N/A
HLBZF - FRCEF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
HCMLY - FRCEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
GCWOF - FRCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - FRCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - FRCEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

GCWOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GCWOF and CX have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GCWOF and CX's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GCWOF
1D Price
Change %
GCWOF100%
N/A
CX - GCWOF
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.84%
HCMLY - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
CTXXF - GCWOF
5%
Poorly correlated
+3.48%
CMTOY - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+8.95%
HLBZF - GCWOF
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
More