FRCEF
Price
$1.85
Change
+$0.15 (+8.82%)
Updated
Apr 29 closing price
Capitalization
2.69B
HDLMY
Price
$46.04
Change
+$0.13 (+0.28%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
15.13B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRCEF vs HDLMY

Header iconFRCEF vs HDLMY Comparison
Open Charts FRCEF vs HDLMYBanner chart's image
Fletcher Building
Price$1.85
Change+$0.15 (+8.82%)
Volume$2.7K
Capitalization2.69B
HEIDELBERG MATERIALS AG
Price$46.04
Change+$0.13 (+0.28%)
Volume$24.81K
Capitalization15.13B
FRCEF vs HDLMY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRCEF vs. HDLMY commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCEF is a Hold and HDLMY is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRCEF: $1.85 vs. HDLMY: $46.04)
Brand notoriety: FRCEF and HDLMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRCEF: 100% vs. HDLMY: 26%
Market capitalization -- FRCEF: $2.69B vs. HDLMY: $15.13B
FRCEF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $2.69B. HDLMY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $15.13B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.92B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRCEF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHDLMY’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRCEF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • HDLMY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, HDLMY is a better buy in the long-term than FRCEF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRCEF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HDLMY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRCEF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 0 bearish.
  • HDLMY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HDLMY is a better buy in the short-term than FRCEF.

Price Growth

FRCEF (@Construction Materials) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while HDLMY (@Construction Materials) price change was +1.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was +2.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.20%.

Reported Earning Dates

HDLMY is expected to report earnings on May 08, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (+2.80% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HDLMY($15.1B) has a higher market cap than FRCEF($2.69B). FRCEF has higher P/E ratio than HDLMY: FRCEF (13.76) vs HDLMY (8.75). HDLMY YTD gains are higher at: 92.729 vs. FRCEF (10.119). HDLMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 3.77B vs. FRCEF (1B). HDLMY has higher revenues than FRCEF: HDLMY (21.1B) vs FRCEF (8.72B).
FRCEFHDLMYFRCEF / HDLMY
Capitalization2.69B15.1B18%
EBITDA1B3.77B27%
Gain YTD10.11992.72911%
P/E Ratio13.768.75157%
Revenue8.72B21.1B41%
Total Cash351MN/A-
Total Debt2.7BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRCEF vs HDLMY: Fundamental Ratings
FRCEF
HDLMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
16
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1005
SMR RATING
1..100
9696
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5436
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
848
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRCEF's Valuation (10) in the null industry is in the same range as HDLMY (16). This means that FRCEF’s stock grew similarly to HDLMY’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRCEF (100). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's SMR Rating (96) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCEF (96). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as FRCEF (54). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew similarly to FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

HDLMY's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRCEF (84). This means that HDLMY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRCEF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRCEFHDLMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRCEF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HDLMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TQQQ84.813.92
+4.85%
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
NFTY60.140.20
+0.33%
First Trust India NIFTY 50 Equal Wtd ETF
PHK4.830.01
+0.21%
PIMCO High Income Fund
CMCI25.38N/A
N/A
VanEck® CMCI Commodity Strategy ETF
BBBI51.26-0.05
-0.10%
BondBloxx BBB Rated 5-10 Yr Corp Bd ETF

FRCEF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRCEF and HLBZF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRCEF and HLBZF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRCEF
1D Price
Change %
FRCEF100%
N/A
HLBZF - FRCEF
13%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
HCMLY - FRCEF
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
GCWOF - FRCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IBJHF - FRCEF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HDLMY - FRCEF
-1%
Poorly correlated
+0.28%
More

HDLMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HDLMY has been closely correlated with HCMLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HDLMY jumps, then HCMLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HDLMY
1D Price
Change %
HDLMY100%
+0.28%
HCMLY - HDLMY
67%
Closely correlated
+0.08%
CRH - HDLMY
56%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
VMC - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.20%
MLM - HDLMY
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
EXP - HDLMY
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.21%
More