Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCSX vs WCMFX
FRCSX vs WCMFX Comparison
Open Charts FRCSX vs WCMFX
Franklin Small Cap Value R6
Price$63.56
Change-$0.11 (-0.17%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.8B
WCM SMID Quality Val Fd Institutional
Price$3.54
Change-$0.01 (-0.28%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.62M
FRCSX vs WCMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCSX vs. WCMFX commentary
Dec 02, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCSX is a Buy and WCMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCSX has more cash in the bank: 3.8B vs. WCMFX (2.62M). FRCSX pays higher dividends than WCMFX: FRCSX (1.08) vs WCMFX (0.00). FRCSX was incepted earlier than WCMFX: FRCSX (13 years) vs WCMFX (6 years). WCMFX (1.45) is less costly to investors than FRCSX (0.61). FRCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 59.68 vs. WCMFX (15.00). WCMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCSX: WCMFX (100000) vs FRCSX (1000000). FRCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.99 vs. WCMFX (-76.06). FRCSX return over 5 years is better than : 25.82 vs. WCMFX (-64.18).
| FRCSX | WCMFX | FRCSX / WCMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.90 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.61 | 1.45 | 42% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.729 | -70.367 | -8% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 100000 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.8B | 2.62M | 145,153% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.99 | -76.06 | 11% |
| Returns for 3 years | 12.58 | -66.73 | -19% |
| Returns for 5 years | 25.82 | -64.18 | -40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 22.80 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement