Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRCZX vs SWCAX
FRCZX vs SWCAX Comparison
Open Charts FRCZX vs SWCAX
Franklin CA Interm-Term Tx-Fr Inc Adv
Price$10.78
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.29B
Schwab CA Tax-Free Bond
Price$10.79
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets460.12M
FRCZX vs SWCAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRCZX vs. SWCAX commentary
Jun 07, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRCZX is a Hold and SWCAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRCZX has more cash in the bank: 1.29B vs. SWCAX (460M). FRCZX (3.31) and SWCAX (3.25) have matching dividends . FRCZX was incepted earlier than SWCAX: FRCZX (17 years) vs SWCAX (33 years). FRCZX (0.57) is less costly to investors than SWCAX (0.41). SWCAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 81.00 vs. FRCZX (16.05). SWCAX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRCZX: SWCAX (0) vs FRCZX (100000). FRCZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.70 vs. SWCAX (0.89). SWCAX return over 5 years is better than : -0.21 vs. FRCZX (-1.42).
| FRCZX | SWCAX | FRCZX / SWCAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.49 | 0.38 | 129% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.57 | 0.41 | 139% |
| Fund Existence | 17 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.530 | -1.200 | 44% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 100000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.29B | 460M | 280% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.31 | 3.25 | 102% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.70 | 0.89 | 191% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.16 | 5.14 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | -1.42 | -0.21 | 678% |
| Returns for 10 years | 1.72 | 12.53 | 14% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement