FRFHF
Price
$1722.84
Change
+$5.77 (+0.34%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
38.8B
34 days until earnings call
IFCZF
Price
$188.25
Change
-$3.66 (-1.91%)
Updated
Sep 25 closing price
Capitalization
33.8B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRFHF vs IFCZF

Header iconFRFHF vs IFCZF Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs IFCZFBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1722.84
Change+$5.77 (+0.34%)
Volume$4.17K
Capitalization38.8B
Intact Financial
Price$188.25
Change-$3.66 (-1.91%)
Volume$90
Capitalization33.8B
FRFHF vs IFCZF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. IFCZF commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a Hold and IFCZF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1722.84 vs. IFCZF: $188.25)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and IFCZF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 91% vs. IFCZF: 1%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $38.8B vs. IFCZF: $33.8B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $38.8B. IFCZF’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $33.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $142.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileIFCZF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • IFCZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRFHF is a better buy in the long-term than IFCZF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while IFCZF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • IFCZF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, IFCZF is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -2.06% price change this week, while IFCZF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -2.88% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -1.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.04%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-1.01% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($38.8B) has a higher market cap than IFCZF($33.8B). IFCZF has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: IFCZF (20.00) vs FRFHF (8.75). FRFHF YTD gains are higher at: 25.320 vs. IFCZF (3.332). IFCZF has more cash in the bank: 19.5B vs. FRFHF (10B). IFCZF has less debt than FRFHF: IFCZF (5.43B) vs FRFHF (13.2B). FRFHF has higher revenues than IFCZF: FRFHF (30.9B) vs IFCZF (24.7B).
FRFHFIFCZFFRFHF / IFCZF
Capitalization38.8B33.8B115%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD25.3203.332760%
P/E Ratio8.7520.0044%
Revenue30.9B24.7B125%
Total Cash10B19.5B51%
Total Debt13.2B5.43B243%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs IFCZF: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
IFCZF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
353
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
224
SMR RATING
1..100
9895
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4962
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3161
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

IFCZF's Valuation (60) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (66). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (2) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (24). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

IFCZF's SMR Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as FRFHF (98). This means that IFCZF’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (62). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as IFCZF (61). This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to IFCZF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFIFCZF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
30%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
13%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
IFCZF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VERA26.960.82
+3.14%
Vera Therapeutics
SPCB13.180.26
+2.01%
SuperCom Ltd
MSBIP24.510.01
+0.04%
Midland States Bancorp
SRAD29.32-0.22
-0.74%
Sportradar Group AG
GDEV20.44-1.58
-7.18%
GDEV Inc

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRFHF and L have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRFHF and L's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
+0.34%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.24%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
TKOMY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-2.47%
MKL - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.27%
MSADY - FRFHF
26%
Poorly correlated
-1.19%
More

IFCZF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, IFCZF has been loosely correlated with PLMR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if IFCZF jumps, then PLMR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To IFCZF
1D Price
Change %
IFCZF100%
-1.91%
PLMR - IFCZF
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.25%
UFCS - IFCZF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
FRFHF - IFCZF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
MCY - IFCZF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.07%
BNT - IFCZF
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.81%
More