FRFHF
Price
$1576.25
Change
-$20.76 (-1.30%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
19.66B
80 days until earnings call
L
Price
$88.40
Change
+$0.43 (+0.49%)
Updated
May 9 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
84 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRFHF vs L

Header iconFRFHF vs L Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs LBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1576.25
Change-$20.76 (-1.30%)
Volume$3.91K
Capitalization19.66B
Loews
Price$88.40
Change+$0.43 (+0.49%)
Volume$507.92K
Capitalization17.4B
FRFHF vs L Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. L commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a Buy and L is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1576.25 vs. L: $88.40)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 101% vs. L: 63%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $19.66B vs. L: $17.4B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.66B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $17.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRFHF is a better buy in the long-term than L.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRFHF is a better buy in the short-term than L.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.90% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +0.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +2.48%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.36%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+2.48% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than L($17.4B). L has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: L (12.32) vs FRFHF (11.39). FRFHF YTD gains are higher at: 14.657 vs. L (4.457). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. FRFHF (10.2B). FRFHF (8.72B) and L (9B) have identical debt. FRFHF has higher revenues than L: FRFHF (27.5B) vs L (15.7B).
FRFHFLFRFHF / L
Capitalization19.7B17.4B113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD14.6574.457329%
P/E Ratio11.3912.3292%
Revenue27.5B15.7B175%
Total Cash10.2B45.2B23%
Total Debt8.72B9B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs L: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5039
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
64
Fair valued
69
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
9999
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4135
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2322
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRFHF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is in the same range as L (69) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as L (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's SMR Rating (99) in the null industry is in the same range as L (99) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (41) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

L's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (23) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
49%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
42%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
43%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GMOWX16.700.36
+2.20%
GMO Resources VI
WILCX10.020.05
+0.50%
Wasatch Global Value Institutional
IUAIX41.590.07
+0.17%
VY® Invesco Equity and Income I
MLPIX107.320.09
+0.08%
ProFunds Mid Cap Value Inv
AZNAX10.85N/A
N/A
Virtus Income & Growth A

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRFHF has been loosely correlated with EG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRFHF jumps, then EG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
-1.30%
EG - FRFHF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.24%
GLRE - FRFHF
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.82%
RGA - FRFHF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.38%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.49%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.32%
More