FRFHF
Price
$1785.51
Change
-$0.21 (-0.01%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
19.66B
5 days until earnings call
L
Price
$91.66
Change
+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
17.4B
9 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRFHF vs L

Header iconFRFHF vs L Comparison
Open Charts FRFHF vs LBanner chart's image
Fairfax Financial Holdings
Price$1785.51
Change-$0.21 (-0.01%)
Volume$1.41K
Capitalization19.66B
Loews
Price$91.66
Change+$0.40 (+0.44%)
Volume$436.66K
Capitalization17.4B
FRFHF vs L Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRFHF vs. L commentary
Jul 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRFHF is a Buy and L is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 26, 2025
Stock price -- (FRFHF: $1785.51 vs. L: $91.66)
Brand notoriety: FRFHF and L are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRFHF: 24% vs. L: 52%
Market capitalization -- FRFHF: $19.66B vs. L: $17.4B
FRFHF [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $19.66B. L’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $17.4B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $121.13B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $14.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRFHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileL’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRFHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • L’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, both FRFHF and L are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRFHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while L’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRFHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • L’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, L is a better buy in the short-term than FRFHF.

Price Growth

FRFHF (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а -0.02% price change this week, while L (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -0.78% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.86%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRFHF is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.

L is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (-0.25% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRFHF($19.7B) has a higher market cap than L($17.4B). L has higher P/E ratio than FRFHF: L (12.32) vs FRFHF (11.39). FRFHF YTD gains are higher at: 29.879 vs. L (8.386). L has more cash in the bank: 45.2B vs. FRFHF (10.2B). FRFHF (8.72B) and L (9B) have identical debt. FRFHF has higher revenues than L: FRFHF (27.5B) vs L (15.7B).
FRFHFLFRFHF / L
Capitalization19.7B17.4B113%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD29.8798.386356%
P/E Ratio11.3912.3292%
Revenue27.5B15.7B175%
Total Cash10.2B45.2B23%
Total Debt8.72B9B97%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRFHF vs L: Fundamental Ratings
FRFHF
L
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7577
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
69
Overvalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
17
SMR RATING
1..100
9898
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4433
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1824
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRFHF's Valuation (69) in the null industry is in the same range as L (71) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as L (7) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as L (98) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

L's Price Growth Rating (33) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as FRFHF (44) in the null industry. This means that L’s stock grew similarly to FRFHF’s over the last 12 months.

FRFHF's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the null industry is in the same range as L (24) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that FRFHF’s stock grew similarly to L’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRFHFL
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
52%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
39%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRFHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
CRYPTO / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VANRY.X0.0364320.001272
+3.62%
Vanar Chain cryptocurrency
FIL.X2.6487700.065872
+2.55%
Filecoin cryptocurrency
UTK.X0.0313030.000616
+2.01%
xMoney cryptocurrency
PROM.X9.6018090.030698
+0.32%
Prom cryptocurrency
BURGER.X0.002493-0.000301
-10.77%
BurgerCities cryptocurrency

FRFHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRFHF has been loosely correlated with EG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRFHF jumps, then EG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRFHF
1D Price
Change %
FRFHF100%
-0.01%
EG - FRFHF
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
GLRE - FRFHF
34%
Loosely correlated
-1.04%
RGA - FRFHF
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.41%
L - FRFHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.44%
IFCZF - FRFHF
29%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
More

L and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, L has been closely correlated with CINF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if L jumps, then CINF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To L
1D Price
Change %
L100%
+0.44%
CINF - L
84%
Closely correlated
+1.03%
HIG - L
83%
Closely correlated
+0.25%
CNA - L
82%
Closely correlated
+1.07%
THG - L
77%
Closely correlated
+2.31%
KMPR - L
76%
Closely correlated
-0.82%
More