Ad is loading...
FRGOX vs FSAGX
FRGOX vs FSAGX Comparison
Open Charts FRGOX vs FSAGX
Franklin Gold and Precious Metals C
Price$20.86
Change-$0.17 (-0.81%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.31B
Fidelity Select Gold
Price$32.93
Change-$0.01 (-0.03%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.93B
FRGOX vs FSAGX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGOX vs. FSAGX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGOX is a Buy and FSAGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSAGX has more cash in the bank: 1.93B vs. FRGOX (1.31B). FRGOX pays higher dividends than FSAGX: FRGOX (10.40) vs FSAGX (2.71). FRGOX was incepted earlier than FSAGX: FRGOX (30 years) vs FSAGX (39 years). FRGOX (1.67) is less costly to investors than FSAGX (0.70). FSAGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 46.00 vs. FRGOX (14.50). FSAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGOX: FSAGX (0) vs FRGOX (1000). FRGOX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 56.76 vs. FSAGX (47.17). FRGOX return over 5 years is better than : 134.35 vs. FSAGX (76.95).
| FRGOX | FSAGX | FRGOX / FSAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.70 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.67 | 0.70 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 39 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 41.236 | 34.011 | 121% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.31B | 1.93B | 68% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 10.40 | 2.71 | 384% |
| Returns for 1 year | 56.76 | 47.17 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 13.80 | 11.71 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 134.35 | 76.95 | 175% |
| Returns for 10 years | 149.92 | 118.20 | 127% |