Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRGSX vs RGEBX
FRGSX vs RGEBX Comparison
Open Charts FRGSX vs RGEBX
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R2E
Price$82.44
Change+$0.19 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets331.65B
FRGSX vs RGEBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRGSX vs. RGEBX commentary
Sep 08, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRGSX is a StrongBuy and RGEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGEBX has more cash in the bank: 332B vs. FRGSX (18.1B). FRGSX (0.00) and RGEBX (0.00) have matching dividends . FRGSX was incepted earlier than RGEBX: FRGSX (30 years) vs RGEBX (11 years). FRGSX (1.54) is less costly to investors than RGEBX (1.09). RGEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 25.00 vs. FRGSX (7.35). RGEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRGSX: RGEBX (250) vs FRGSX (1000). RGEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.59 vs. FRGSX (3.92). RGEBX return over 5 years is better than : 38.71 vs. FRGSX (3.16).
| FRGSX | RGEBX | FRGSX / RGEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.09 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.54 | 1.09 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 11 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.355 | 15.398 | 67% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 18.1B | 332B | 5% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.92 | 17.59 | 22% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.38 | 57.61 | 37% |
| Returns for 5 years | 3.16 | 38.71 | 8% |
| Returns for 10 years | 75.18 | 91.44 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement