FRHC
Price
$127.61
Change
-$9.95 (-7.23%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.74B
69 days until earnings call
TIGR
Price
$8.30
Change
-$0.35 (-4.05%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
533.37M
54 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRHC vs TIGR

Header iconFRHC vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts FRHC vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Freedom Holding
Price$127.61
Change-$9.95 (-7.23%)
Volume$74.21K
Capitalization7.74B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$8.30
Change-$0.35 (-4.05%)
Volume$5.05M
Capitalization533.37M
FRHC vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHC vs. TIGR commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a StrongBuy and TIGR is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHC: $127.61 vs. TIGR: $8.30)
Brand notoriety: FRHC and TIGR are both not notable
FRHC represents the Financial Conglomerates, while TIGR is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHC: 84% vs. TIGR: 62%
Market capitalization -- FRHC: $7.74B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
FRHC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $7.74B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $3.83B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $11.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а -7.56% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.86%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was -4.65%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +137.74%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHC is expected to report earnings on Jun 12, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on May 28, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (+0.81% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (-4.65% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHC($7.74B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). FRHC has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: FRHC (23.81) vs TIGR (15.40). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 28.483 vs. FRHC (-2.357). FRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 926M vs. TIGR (69.1M). FRHC has more cash in the bank: 4.41B vs. TIGR (678M). TIGR has less debt than FRHC: TIGR (166M) vs FRHC (2.71B). FRHC has higher revenues than TIGR: FRHC (2.08B) vs TIGR (252M).
FRHCTIGRFRHC / TIGR
Capitalization7.74B533M1,451%
EBITDA926M69.1M1,340%
Gain YTD-2.35728.483-8%
P/E Ratio23.8115.40155%
Revenue2.08B252M825%
Total Cash4.41B678M651%
Total Debt2.71B166M1,632%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHC vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
FRHC
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6479
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
73
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
781
SMR RATING
1..100
3481
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4037
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
712
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGR's Valuation (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FRHC (73) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to FRHC’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's SMR Rating (34) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TIGR's Price Growth Rating (37) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FRHC (40) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to FRHC’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's P/E Growth Rating (7) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (12) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHCTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
82%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NUW13.950.12
+0.87%
Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Value Fund
FMN10.930.03
+0.28%
Federated Hermes Premier Municipal Income Fund
FOCT40.52-1.33
-3.18%
FT Vest US Equity Buffer ETF Oct
CDEI64.72-3.24
-4.77%
Calvert US Large-Cp Div, Eq AndIncETF
VONE244.05-12.51
-4.88%
Vanguard Russell 1000 ETF

FRHC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHC has been loosely correlated with JEF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRHC jumps, then JEF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHC
1D Price
Change %
FRHC100%
-7.23%
JEF - FRHC
59%
Loosely correlated
-13.04%
TIGR - FRHC
44%
Loosely correlated
-4.05%
HOOD - FRHC
39%
Loosely correlated
-10.36%
IBKR - FRHC
32%
Poorly correlated
-8.51%
NDAQ - FRHC
29%
Poorly correlated
-5.76%
More

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-4.05%
FUTU - TIGR
72%
Closely correlated
-5.78%
HKXCY - TIGR
53%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
HKXCF - TIGR
35%
Loosely correlated
-3.35%
HOOD - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
-10.36%
COIN - TIGR
26%
Poorly correlated
-6.66%
More