FRHC
Price
$177.85
Change
-$5.22 (-2.85%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.1B
21 days until earnings call
TIGR
Price
$8.93
Change
-$0.11 (-1.22%)
Updated
May 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
533.37M
7 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHC vs TIGR

Header iconFRHC vs TIGR Comparison
Open Charts FRHC vs TIGRBanner chart's image
Freedom Holding
Price$177.85
Change-$5.22 (-2.85%)
Volume$947
Capitalization11.1B
UP Fintech Holding
Price$8.93
Change-$0.11 (-1.22%)
Volume$48.44K
Capitalization533.37M
FRHC vs TIGR Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHC vs. TIGR commentary
May 22, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHC is a StrongBuy and TIGR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 22, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHC: $177.89 vs. TIGR: $8.93)
Brand notoriety: FRHC and TIGR are both not notable
FRHC represents the Financial Conglomerates, while TIGR is part of the Investment Banks/Brokers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHC: 227% vs. TIGR: 27%
Market capitalization -- FRHC: $11.1B vs. TIGR: $533.37M
FRHC [@Financial Conglomerates] is valued at $11.1B. TIGR’s [@Investment Banks/Brokers] market capitalization is $533.37M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry ranges from $590.24B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry ranges from $928.5B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Financial Conglomerates] industry is $4.46B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Banks/Brokers] industry is $12.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHC’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileTIGR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • TIGR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the long-term than TIGR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TIGR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TIGR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHC is a better buy in the short-term than TIGR.

Price Growth

FRHC (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +5.04% price change this week, while TIGR (@Investment Banks/Brokers) price change was -8.41% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.59%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +12.64%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.92%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Banks/Brokers industry was +0.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +23.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +97.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHC is expected to report earnings on Aug 08, 2025.

TIGR is expected to report earnings on Sep 04, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Financial Conglomerates (-0.59% weekly)

Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.

@Investment Banks/Brokers (+0.79% weekly)

These banks specialize in underwriting (helping companies with debt financing or equity issuances), IPOs, facilitating mergers and other corporate reorganizations and acting as a broker or financial advisor for institutions. They might also trade securities on their own accounts. Investment banks potentially thrive on expanding its network of clients, since that could help them increase profits. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and CME Group Inc are some of the largest investment banking companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHC($11.1B) has a higher market cap than TIGR($533M). FRHC has higher P/E ratio than TIGR: FRHC (33.19) vs TIGR (15.40). TIGR YTD gains are higher at: 38.235 vs. FRHC (36.116). FRHC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 926M vs. TIGR (69.1M). FRHC has more cash in the bank: 4.41B vs. TIGR (678M). TIGR has less debt than FRHC: TIGR (166M) vs FRHC (2.71B). FRHC has higher revenues than TIGR: FRHC (2.08B) vs TIGR (252M).
FRHCTIGRFRHC / TIGR
Capitalization11.1B533M2,083%
EBITDA926M69.1M1,340%
Gain YTD36.11638.23594%
P/E Ratio33.1915.40216%
Revenue2.08B252M825%
Total Cash4.41B678M651%
Total Debt2.71B166M1,632%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHC vs TIGR: Fundamental Ratings
FRHC
TIGR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3420
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
67
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
581
SMR RATING
1..100
3381
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
570
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8529

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TIGR's Valuation (67) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry is in the same range as FRHC (74) in the null industry. This means that TIGR’s stock grew similarly to FRHC’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TIGR (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew significantly faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (81) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TIGR (36) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew similarly to TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

FRHC's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TIGR (70) in the Investment Banks Or Brokers industry. This means that FRHC’s stock grew somewhat faster than TIGR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHCTIGR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
89%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
87%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TIGR
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PRASX17.73N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price New Asia
ARAGX9.66N/A
N/A
Aristotle Growth Equity A
SCIJX20.37N/A
N/A
Hartford Schroders International Stk SDR
ARAHX6.68N/A
N/A
Aristotle Small/Mid Cap Equity A
CAPCX8.62-0.09
-1.03%
Federated Hermes Capital Income C

TIGR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TIGR has been closely correlated with FUTU. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TIGR jumps, then FUTU could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TIGR
1D Price
Change %
TIGR100%
-1.22%
FUTU - TIGR
72%
Closely correlated
-0.76%
HKXCY - TIGR
53%
Loosely correlated
+2.25%
HKXCF - TIGR
35%
Loosely correlated
N/A
IREN - TIGR
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.25%
BGC - TIGR
27%
Poorly correlated
-2.46%
More