FRHLF
Price
$9.55
Change
-$0.07 (-0.73%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
PIFYF
Price
$0.42
Change
-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
153.46M
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHLF vs PIFYF

Header iconFRHLF vs PIFYF Comparison
Open Charts FRHLF vs PIFYFBanner chart's image
Freehold Royalties
Price$9.55
Change-$0.07 (-0.73%)
Volume$77.16K
Capitalization1.57B
Pine Cliff Energy
Price$0.42
Change-$0.01 (-2.33%)
Volume$121.44K
Capitalization153.46M
FRHLF vs PIFYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHLF vs. PIFYF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Hold and PIFYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHLF: $9.55 vs. PIFYF: $0.42)
Brand notoriety: FRHLF and PIFYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHLF: 81% vs. PIFYF: 114%
Market capitalization -- FRHLF: $1.57B vs. PIFYF: $153.46M
FRHLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.57B. PIFYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $153.46M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $116.09B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.62B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePIFYF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • PIFYF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the long-term than PIFYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PIFYF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PIFYF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the short-term than PIFYF.

Price Growth

FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а -2.04% price change this week, while PIFYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was -2.33% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was -0.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.68%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (-0.25% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.57B) has a higher market cap than PIFYF($153M). PIFYF has higher P/E ratio than FRHLF: PIFYF (89.42) vs FRHLF (17.33). FRHLF YTD gains are higher at: 7.424 vs. PIFYF (-34.375). FRHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 281M vs. PIFYF (29.8M). FRHLF (0) and PIFYF (0) have equal amount of cash in the bank . PIFYF has less debt than FRHLF: PIFYF (51.6M) vs FRHLF (294M). FRHLF has higher revenues than PIFYF: FRHLF (320M) vs PIFYF (187M).
FRHLFPIFYFFRHLF / PIFYF
Capitalization1.57B153M1,025%
EBITDA281M29.8M943%
Gain YTD7.424-34.375-22%
P/E Ratio17.3389.4219%
Revenue320M187M171%
Total Cash00-
Total Debt294M51.6M570%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHLF vs PIFYF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHLF
PIFYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5169
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4280
SMR RATING
1..100
6297
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5365
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
226
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRHLF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for PIFYF (82). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew significantly faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (80). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PIFYF (97). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Price Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is in the same range as PIFYF (65). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to PIFYF’s over the last 12 months.

PIFYF's P/E Growth Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (22). This means that PIFYF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHLFPIFYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PIFYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VLAAX41.730.11
+0.26%
Value Line Asset Allocation Investor
STBIX487.82N/A
N/A
State Street Equity 500 Index Svc
HDOGX13.93N/A
N/A
Hennessy Total Return Investor
FGKMX140.52N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Communication ServicesZ
DESAX25.25N/A
N/A
DWS ESG Core Equity A

PIFYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PIFYF has been loosely correlated with KOS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 40% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PIFYF jumps, then KOS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PIFYF
1D Price
Change %
PIFYF100%
-1.41%
KOS - PIFYF
40%
Loosely correlated
-4.65%
ZPTAF - PIFYF
36%
Loosely correlated
-3.43%
VET - PIFYF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.67%
FRHLF - PIFYF
35%
Loosely correlated
-0.73%
GTE - PIFYF
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.72%
More