FRHLF
Price
$9.39
Change
+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.58B
TNEYF
Price
$3.55
Change
-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
1.52B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHLF vs TNEYF

Header iconFRHLF vs TNEYF Comparison
Open Charts FRHLF vs TNEYFBanner chart's image
Freehold Royalties
Price$9.39
Change+$0.04 (+0.43%)
Volume$50.59K
Capitalization1.58B
Tamarack Valley Energy
Price$3.55
Change-$0.01 (-0.28%)
Volume$4.72K
Capitalization1.52B
FRHLF vs TNEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHLF vs. TNEYF commentary
Jul 01, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Hold and TNEYF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 01, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHLF: $9.39 vs. TNEYF: $3.55)
Brand notoriety: FRHLF and TNEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHLF: 33% vs. TNEYF: 13%
Market capitalization -- FRHLF: $1.58B vs. TNEYF: $1.52B
FRHLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.58B. TNEYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $1.52B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $151.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $4.27B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNEYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • TNEYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the long-term than FRHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNEYF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • TNEYF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, TNEYF is a better buy in the short-term than FRHLF.

Price Growth

FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +0.43% price change this week, while TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +0.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +0.18%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRHLF is expected to report earnings on May 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+0.18% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRHLF($1.58B) and TNEYF($1.52B) have the same market capitalization . FRHLF has higher P/E ratio than TNEYF: FRHLF (13.19) vs TNEYF (9.00). TNEYF YTD gains are higher at: 6.712 vs. FRHLF (5.624). TNEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 897M vs. FRHLF (370M). TNEYF has more cash in the bank: 97.5M vs. FRHLF (508K). FRHLF has less debt than TNEYF: FRHLF (161M) vs TNEYF (1.36B). TNEYF has higher revenues than FRHLF: TNEYF (1.53B) vs FRHLF (382M).
FRHLFTNEYFFRHLF / TNEYF
Capitalization1.58B1.52B104%
EBITDA370M897M41%
Gain YTD5.6246.71284%
P/E Ratio13.199.00147%
Revenue382M1.53B25%
Total Cash508K97.5M1%
Total Debt161M1.36B12%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHLF vs TNEYF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHLF
TNEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6776
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
17
Undervalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3641
SMR RATING
1..100
5460
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5343
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6998
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
21n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRHLF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (36). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (41). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (60). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (53). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's P/E Growth Rating (69) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (98). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHLFTNEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RLEOX12.00N/A
N/A
Lazard Emerging Markets Core Equity R6
KLCCX11.32N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes Kaufmann Large Cap C
FSCHX12.80N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Chemicals
SSAQX75.57N/A
N/A
State Street US Core Equity Fund
MSVDX5.36N/A
N/A
Morgan Stanley Vitality Portfolio I

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
-0.28%
BTE - FRHLF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
CRLFF - FRHLF
70%
Closely correlated
-0.40%
SPGYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
VET - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
TNEYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
More

TNEYF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNEYF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if TNEYF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TNEYF
1D Price
Change %
TNEYF100%
-0.18%
BTE - TNEYF
79%
Closely correlated
-2.19%
ZPTAF - TNEYF
77%
Closely correlated
+0.45%
CDDRF - TNEYF
73%
Closely correlated
N/A
SPGYF - TNEYF
73%
Closely correlated
+0.90%
VET - TNEYF
72%
Closely correlated
-2.80%
More