FRHLF
Price
$10.06
Change
+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
1.66B
TNEYF
Price
$4.41
Change
+$0.05 (+1.15%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRHLF vs TNEYF

Header iconFRHLF vs TNEYF Comparison
Open Charts FRHLF vs TNEYFBanner chart's image
Freehold Royalties
Price$10.06
Change+$0.05 (+0.50%)
Volume$55.98K
Capitalization1.66B
Tamarack Valley Energy
Price$4.41
Change+$0.05 (+1.15%)
Volume$7.21K
Capitalization2.2B
FRHLF vs TNEYF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRHLF vs. TNEYF commentary
Sep 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRHLF is a Buy and TNEYF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRHLF: $10.06 vs. TNEYF: $4.41)
Brand notoriety: FRHLF and TNEYF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Oil & Gas Production industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRHLF: 84% vs. TNEYF: 22%
Market capitalization -- FRHLF: $1.66B vs. TNEYF: $2.2B
FRHLF [@Oil & Gas Production] is valued at $1.66B. TNEYF’s [@Oil & Gas Production] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry ranges from $123B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Oil & Gas Production] industry is $3.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRHLF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTNEYF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRHLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TNEYF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRHLF is a better buy in the long-term than TNEYF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRHLF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNEYF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRHLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TNEYF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRHLF and TNEYF are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRHLF (@Oil & Gas Production) experienced а +2.04% price change this week, while TNEYF (@Oil & Gas Production) price change was +3.38% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Oil & Gas Production industry was +3.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +7.38%, and the average quarterly price growth was +30.79%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Oil & Gas Production (+3.79% weekly)

The oil and gas production segment includes companies that specialize in exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas. These companies are focused on upstream operations. Companies typically identify deposits, drill wells, and extract raw materials from underground. The industry also includes related services like rig operations, feasibility studies, machinery rentals etc. Several operators in this industry work with various types of contractors such as engineering procurement and construction contractors, as well as with joint-venture partners and oil field service companies. Oil and gas often involves large fixed costs of production; so, declining crude oil prices, for example, is a potential negative for this industry. Conoco Phillips, EOG Resources, Inc. and Pioneer Natural Resources Company are some examples of companies operating in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
TNEYF($2.2B) has a higher market cap than FRHLF($1.66B). FRHLF has higher P/E ratio than TNEYF: FRHLF (18.40) vs TNEYF (12.76). TNEYF YTD gains are higher at: 32.312 vs. FRHLF (13.172). TNEYF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 983M vs. FRHLF (281M). TNEYF has more cash in the bank: 2.76M vs. FRHLF (0). FRHLF has less debt than TNEYF: FRHLF (294M) vs TNEYF (748M). TNEYF has higher revenues than FRHLF: TNEYF (1.74B) vs FRHLF (320M).
FRHLFTNEYFFRHLF / TNEYF
Capitalization1.66B2.2B75%
EBITDA281M983M29%
Gain YTD13.17232.31241%
P/E Ratio18.4012.76144%
Revenue320M1.74B18%
Total Cash02.76M-
Total Debt294M748M39%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRHLF vs TNEYF: Fundamental Ratings
FRHLF
TNEYF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3938
SMR RATING
1..100
6265
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5240
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1976
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRHLF's Valuation (15) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (35). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (39). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as TNEYF (65). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew similarly to TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TNEYF's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as FRHLF (52). This means that TNEYF’s stock grew similarly to FRHLF’s over the last 12 months.

FRHLF's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TNEYF (76). This means that FRHLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TNEYF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRHLFTNEYF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
89%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRHLF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TNEYF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMIFX23.23N/A
N/A
FMI International II Ccy UnH Ins
LGRNX33.66N/A
N/A
Loomis Sayles Growth N
CCRIX28.34N/A
N/A
Columbia Small Cap Growth R
GSYPX43.17N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Value P
ALOAX20.50N/A
N/A
Alger Mid Cap Focus A

FRHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRHLF has been closely correlated with BTE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 72% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if FRHLF jumps, then BTE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRHLF
1D Price
Change %
FRHLF100%
+0.50%
BTE - FRHLF
72%
Closely correlated
+2.44%
CRLFF - FRHLF
70%
Closely correlated
+1.23%
VET - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
+3.63%
TNEYF - FRHLF
68%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
ZPTAF - FRHLF
67%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
More