Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRLPX vs NSFKX
FRLPX vs NSFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRLPX vs. NSFKX commentary
Jun 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRLPX is a Hold and NSFKX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRLPX has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. NSFKX (21.5M). FRLPX pays higher dividends than NSFKX: FRLPX (1.96) vs NSFKX (1.39). FRLPX was incepted earlier than NSFKX: FRLPX (5 years) vs NSFKX (8 years). NSFKX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FRLPX (0.05). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FRLPX (12.00). NSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLPX: NSFKX (1000000) vs FRLPX (2000000000). FRLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.22 vs. NSFKX (6.88). FRLPX return over 5 years is better than : 71.93 vs. NSFKX (36.29).
| FRLPX | NSFKX | FRLPX / NSFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.25 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.248 | 4.385 | 188% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.6B | 21.5M | 100,465% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.96 | 1.39 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.22 | 6.88 | 192% |
| Returns for 3 years | 47.47 | 34.96 | 136% |
| Returns for 5 years | 71.93 | 36.29 | 198% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers