Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRLPX vs NSFKX
FRLPX vs NSFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRLPX vs. NSFKX commentary
Jul 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRLPX is a Hold and NSFKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRLPX has more cash in the bank: 22.8B vs. NSFKX (8.02M). FRLPX pays higher dividends than NSFKX: FRLPX (1.88) vs NSFKX (1.33). FRLPX was incepted earlier than NSFKX: FRLPX (5 years) vs NSFKX (8 years). NSFKX (1.25) is less costly to investors than FRLPX (0.05). NSFKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 20.00 vs. FRLPX (12.00). NSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRLPX: NSFKX (1000000) vs FRLPX (2000000000). FRLPX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.92 vs. NSFKX (-41.65). FRLPX return over 5 years is better than : 68.53 vs. NSFKX (-30.17).
| FRLPX | NSFKX | FRLPX / NSFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 0.49 | 10% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.05 | 1.25 | 4% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.527 | -42.838 | -29% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2000000000 | 1000000 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.8B | 8.02M | 284,289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.88 | 1.33 | 141% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.92 | -41.65 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 53.07 | -26.60 | -200% |
| Returns for 5 years | 68.53 | -30.17 | -227% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | N/A | - |