FRME
Price
$37.12
Change
-$0.09 (-0.24%)
Updated
Nov 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.15B
57 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
MBWM
Price
$46.49
Change
-$0.27 (-0.58%)
Updated
Nov 26, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
755.71M
55 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRME vs MBWM

Header iconFRME vs MBWM Comparison
Open Charts FRME vs MBWMBanner chart's image
First Merchants
Price$37.12
Change-$0.09 (-0.24%)
Volume$7.62K
Capitalization2.15B
Mercantile Bank
Price$46.49
Change-$0.27 (-0.58%)
Volume$1.09K
Capitalization755.71M
FRME vs MBWM Comparison Chart in %
FRME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRME vs. MBWM commentary
Nov 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRME is a StrongBuy and MBWM is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2025
Stock price -- (FRME: $37.20 vs. MBWM: $46.76)
Brand notoriety: FRME and MBWM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRME: 78% vs. MBWM: 114%
Market capitalization -- FRME: $2.15B vs. MBWM: $755.71M
FRME [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.15B. MBWM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $755.71M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $173.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $8.05B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRME’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMBWM’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRME’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MBWM’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MBWM is a better buy in the long-term than FRME.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRME’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBWM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRME’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBWM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both FRME and MBWM are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

FRME (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.92% price change this week, while MBWM (@Regional Banks) price change was +6.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +2.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.55%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRME is expected to report earnings on Jan 22, 2026.

MBWM is expected to report earnings on Jan 20, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+2.71% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRME($2.15B) has a higher market cap than MBWM($756M). FRME has higher P/E ratio than MBWM: FRME (9.28) vs MBWM (8.82). MBWM YTD gains are higher at: 7.703 vs. FRME (-4.202). MBWM has more cash in the bank: 98.9M vs. FRME (81.6M). MBWM has less debt than FRME: MBWM (487M) vs FRME (856M). FRME has higher revenues than MBWM: FRME (648M) vs MBWM (239M).
FRMEMBWMFRME / MBWM
Capitalization2.15B756M284%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-4.2027.703-55%
P/E Ratio9.288.82105%
Revenue648M239M271%
Total Cash81.6M98.9M83%
Total Debt856M487M176%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRME vs MBWM: Fundamental Ratings
FRME
MBWM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1012
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
30
Undervalued
30
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5518
SMR RATING
1..100
1625
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7359
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8759
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
6550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRME's Valuation (30) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (30). This means that FRME’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Profit vs Risk Rating (18) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRME (55). This means that MBWM’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRME’s over the last 12 months.

FRME's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as MBWM (25). This means that FRME’s stock grew similarly to MBWM’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's Price Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (73). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

MBWM's P/E Growth Rating (59) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FRME (87). This means that MBWM’s stock grew similarly to FRME’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRMEMBWM
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRME
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
MBWM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RRIGX23.040.33
+1.45%
T. Rowe Price International Value Eq R
CRFAX12.640.17
+1.36%
Calvert Focused Value A
JERSX12.160.08
+0.66%
Janus Henderson Global Real Estate S
GERAX10.95N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Em Mkts Eq Insghts A
AOFYX22.65N/A
N/A
Alger Small Cap Focus Y

MBWM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBWM has been closely correlated with TCBK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MBWM jumps, then TCBK could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBWM
1D Price
Change %
MBWM100%
+3.77%
TCBK - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+4.23%
FMBH - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+2.56%
CCNE - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+3.13%
BSRR - MBWM
88%
Closely correlated
+2.96%
PEBO - MBWM
87%
Closely correlated
+2.92%
More