FRMO
Price
$8.73
Change
-$0.07 (-0.80%)
Updated
Sep 26 closing price
Capitalization
384.32M
GBLBY
Price
$8.57
Change
-$0.43 (-4.78%)
Updated
Sep 24 closing price
Capitalization
10.68B
Interact to see
Advertisement

FRMO vs GBLBY

Header iconFRMO vs GBLBY Comparison
Open Charts FRMO vs GBLBYBanner chart's image
FRMO
Price$8.73
Change-$0.07 (-0.80%)
Volume$1.45K
Capitalization384.32M
Groupe Bruxelles Lambert SA
Price$8.57
Change-$0.43 (-4.78%)
Volume$989
Capitalization10.68B
FRMO vs GBLBY Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRMO vs. GBLBY commentary
Sep 29, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMO is a Hold and GBLBY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 29, 2025
Stock price -- (FRMO: $8.73 vs. GBLBY: $8.57)
Brand notoriety: FRMO and GBLBY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRMO: 13% vs. GBLBY: 37%
Market capitalization -- FRMO: $384.32M vs. GBLBY: $10.68B
FRMO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $384.32M. GBLBY’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $10.68B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $179.08B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRMO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGBLBY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • FRMO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GBLBY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBY is a better buy in the long-term than FRMO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRMO’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GBLBY’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRMO’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • GBLBY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GBLBY is a better buy in the short-term than FRMO.

Price Growth

FRMO (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.40% price change this week, while GBLBY (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.00%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.09%, and the average quarterly price growth was +22.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.00% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GBLBY($10.7B) has a higher market cap than FRMO($384M). GBLBY YTD gains are higher at: 34.928 vs. FRMO (-10.645).
FRMOGBLBYFRMO / GBLBY
Capitalization384M10.7B4%
EBITDAN/A786M-
Gain YTD-10.64534.928-30%
P/E RatioN/A307.91-
RevenueN/A6.09B-
Total CashN/A3.37B-
Total DebtN/A7.39B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRMO vs GBLBY: Fundamental Ratings
FRMO
GBLBY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
75
Overvalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
7870
SMR RATING
1..100
292
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5651
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
941
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5065

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GBLBY's Valuation (11) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRMO (75). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBY's Profit vs Risk Rating (70) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMO (78). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew similarly to FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's SMR Rating (2) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for GBLBY (92). This means that FRMO’s stock grew significantly faster than GBLBY’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBY's Price Growth Rating (51) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMO (56). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew similarly to FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

GBLBY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for FRMO (94). This means that GBLBY’s stock grew significantly faster than FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRMOGBLBY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
59%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
GBLBY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MVALX43.940.60
+1.38%
Meridian Contrarian Legacy
DRSVX19.070.24
+1.27%
North Square Small Cap Value Investor
RYFIX107.070.74
+0.70%
Rydex Financial Services Inv
TILPX32.400.17
+0.53%
Nuveen Large Cap Growth Premier
TWMIX14.03-0.17
-1.20%
American Century Emerging Markets Inv

FRMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRMO and MRCC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRMO and MRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRMO
1D Price
Change %
FRMO100%
-0.80%
MRCC - FRMO
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
FRRPF - FRMO
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - FRMO
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GMPXF - FRMO
-1%
Poorly correlated
-1.06%
HALFF - FRMO
-3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

GBLBY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that GBLBY and GMHLF have been poorly correlated (+8% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that GBLBY and GMHLF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GBLBY
1D Price
Change %
GBLBY100%
N/A
GMHLF - GBLBY
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HCGI - GBLBY
5%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRMO - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
-0.80%
GCAAF - GBLBY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FRRPF - GBLBY
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More