FRMO
Price
$7.95
Change
-$0.34 (-4.10%)
Updated
Apr 16 closing price
Capitalization
211.12M
MRCC
Price
$7.11
Change
+$0.06 (+0.85%)
Updated
Apr 17, 02:47 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
156M
20 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

FRMO vs MRCC

Header iconFRMO vs MRCC Comparison
Open Charts FRMO vs MRCCBanner chart's image
FRMO
Price$7.95
Change-$0.34 (-4.10%)
Volume$9.66K
Capitalization211.12M
Monroe Capital
Price$7.11
Change+$0.06 (+0.85%)
Volume$111
Capitalization156M
FRMO vs MRCC Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRMO vs. MRCC commentary
Apr 17, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMO is a StrongBuy and MRCC is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 17, 2025
Stock price -- (FRMO: $7.95 vs. MRCC: $7.05)
Brand notoriety: FRMO and MRCC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRMO: 96% vs. MRCC: 60%
Market capitalization -- FRMO: $211.12M vs. MRCC: $156M
FRMO [@Investment Managers] is valued at $211.12M. MRCC’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $156M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRMO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMRCC’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • FRMO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MRCC’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, MRCC is a better buy in the long-term than FRMO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRMO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MRCC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRMO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • MRCC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FRMO is a better buy in the short-term than MRCC.

Price Growth

FRMO (@Investment Managers) experienced а +0.63% price change this week, while MRCC (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.81% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.89%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.39%.

Reported Earning Dates

FRMO is expected to report earnings on Apr 13, 2023.

MRCC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.92% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRMO($211M) has a higher market cap than MRCC($156M). MRCC YTD gains are higher at: -14.404 vs. FRMO (-18.628). FRMO has more cash in the bank: 89.8M vs. MRCC (5.32M). FRMO has higher revenues than MRCC: FRMO (6.74M) vs MRCC (5.47M).
FRMOMRCCFRMO / MRCC
Capitalization211M156M135%
EBITDA6.29MN/A-
Gain YTD-18.628-14.404129%
P/E RatioN/A365.00-
Revenue6.74M5.47M123%
Total Cash89.8M5.32M1,687%
Total DebtN/A301M-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRMO vs MRCC: Fundamental Ratings
FRMO
MRCC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
264
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
4
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5721
SMR RATING
1..100
626
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5858
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
93100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MRCC's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRMO (63). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

MRCC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FRMO (57). This means that MRCC’s stock grew somewhat faster than FRMO’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's SMR Rating (6) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (26). This means that FRMO’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (58). This means that FRMO’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

FRMO's P/E Growth Rating (93) in the null industry is in the same range as MRCC (100). This means that FRMO’s stock grew similarly to MRCC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRMOMRCC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRMO
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MRCC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EEMDX7.75N/A
N/A
MFS Emerging Markets Equity Research R1
LIRRX8.61N/A
N/A
Lord Abbett International Value R3
TOECX32.86N/A
N/A
Touchstone Mid Cap Growth C
FIKNX17.79N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Value Z
CAGEX14.86-0.31
-2.04%
Calamos Global Equity A

FRMO and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FRMO and MRCC have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FRMO and MRCC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRMO
1D Price
Change %
FRMO100%
-4.10%
MRCC - FRMO
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.22%
FRRPF - FRMO
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GBLBY - FRMO
4%
Poorly correlated
+6.18%
GMPXF - FRMO
-1%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
HRGLF - FRMO
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MRCC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MRCC has been loosely correlated with FDUS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MRCC jumps, then FDUS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MRCC
1D Price
Change %
MRCC100%
-2.22%
FDUS - MRCC
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.60%
NMFC - MRCC
54%
Loosely correlated
+0.11%
ARCC - MRCC
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.40%
SEIC - MRCC
50%
Loosely correlated
-2.50%
MAIN - MRCC
49%
Loosely correlated
-1.73%
More