Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRMOX vs MDXBX
FRMOX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FRMOX vs MDXBX
Franklin MO Tax Free Income A1
Price$10.00
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets615.37M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.74
Change-$0.01 (-0.10%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.27B
FRMOX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRMOX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jul 15, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMOX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.27B vs. FRMOX (615M). FRMOX (3.60) and MDXBX (3.46) have matching dividends . FRMOX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FRMOX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FRMOX (0.67) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FRMOX (7.70). FRMOX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FRMOX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.45 vs. FRMOX (-1.18). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 2.05 vs. FRMOX (-6.09).
| FRMOX | MDXBX | FRMOX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.49 | 137% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.67 | 0.53 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -2.217 | -1.598 | 139% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 615M | 2.27B | 27% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.60 | 3.46 | 104% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.18 | -0.45 | 265% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.34 | 6.09 | 38% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.09 | 2.05 | -297% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.31 | 13.00 | -25% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement