FRMUF
Price
$3.94
Change
-$0.11 (-2.72%)
Updated
Dec 11 closing price
KMMPF
Price
$11.82
Change
-$0.28 (-2.31%)
Updated
Dec 19 closing price
Ad is loading...

FRMUF vs KMMPF

Header iconFRMUF vs KMMPF Comparison
Open Charts FRMUF vs KMMPFBanner chart's image
Firm Capital Property Trust
Price$3.94
Change-$0.11 (-2.72%)
Volume$303
CapitalizationN/A
Killiam Apt Real Estate Invt Tr
Price$11.82
Change-$0.28 (-2.31%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
FRMUF vs KMMPF Comparison Chart
Loading...
FRMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
FRMUF vs. KMMPF commentary
Dec 20, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRMUF is a Sell and KMMPF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 20, 2024
Stock price -- (FRMUF: $3.94 vs. KMMPF: $11.82)
Brand notoriety: FRMUF and KMMPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: FRMUF: 4% vs. KMMPF: 2%
Market capitalization -- FRMUF: $151.01M vs. KMMPF: $1.62B
FRMUF [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] is valued at $151.01M. KMMPF’s [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] market capitalization is $1.62B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry ranges from $243.79B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Real Estate Investment Trusts] industry is $5.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

FRMUF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKMMPF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • FRMUF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KMMPF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FRMUF is a better buy in the long-term than KMMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

FRMUF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KMMPF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • FRMUF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KMMPF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KMMPF is a better buy in the short-term than FRMUF.

Price Growth

FRMUF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while KMMPF (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) price change was -5.59% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.97%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.03%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.98%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.97% weekly)

A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KMMPF($1.62B) has a higher market cap than FRMUF($151M). FRMUF has higher P/E ratio than KMMPF: FRMUF (79.37) vs KMMPF (8.27). FRMUF YTD gains are higher at: 5.348 vs. KMMPF (-17.227). KMMPF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 366M vs. FRMUF (11.7M). KMMPF has more cash in the bank: 14.1M vs. FRMUF (4.79M). FRMUF has less debt than KMMPF: FRMUF (332M) vs KMMPF (2.19B). KMMPF has higher revenues than FRMUF: KMMPF (348M) vs FRMUF (55.2M).
FRMUFKMMPFFRMUF / KMMPF
Capitalization151M1.62B9%
EBITDA11.7M366M3%
Gain YTD5.348-17.227-31%
P/E Ratio79.378.27959%
Revenue55.2M348M16%
Total Cash4.79M14.1M34%
Total Debt332M2.19B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
FRMUF vs KMMPF: Fundamental Ratings
FRMUF
KMMPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9478
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
13
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
6263
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5878
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9384
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

FRMUF's Valuation (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KMMPF (56). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew somewhat faster than KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRMUF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (100). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRMUF's SMR Rating (62) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (63). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

FRMUF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as KMMPF (78). This means that FRMUF’s stock grew similarly to KMMPF’s over the last 12 months.

KMMPF's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as FRMUF (93). This means that KMMPF’s stock grew similarly to FRMUF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
FRMUFKMMPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
36%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
37%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
38%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
20%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
35%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
45%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
FRMUF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
KMMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GEMPX12.130.13
+1.11%
Goldman Sachs Emerging Mkts Eq ex. Chn P
BIOPX47.440.02
+0.04%
Baron Opportunity Retail
BGSRX66.01N/A
N/A
BlackRock Technology Opportunities R
FACPX43.17-0.07
-0.16%
Fidelity Advisor Consumer Discret M
ASQGX16.31-0.05
-0.31%
American Century Small Company R5

FRMUF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FRMUF has been loosely correlated with TUERF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FRMUF jumps, then TUERF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FRMUF
1D Price
Change %
FRMUF100%
N/A
TUERF - FRMUF
38%
Loosely correlated
N/A
KMMPF - FRMUF
20%
Poorly correlated
-2.31%
EFRTF - FRMUF
9%
Poorly correlated
+0.53%
DEXSF - FRMUF
3%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FBBPF - FRMUF
1%
Poorly correlated
-0.55%
More

KMMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that KMMPF and CROMF have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that KMMPF and CROMF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KMMPF
1D Price
Change %
KMMPF100%
-2.31%
CROMF - KMMPF
28%
Poorly correlated
-3.87%
PEB - KMMPF
27%
Poorly correlated
+1.04%
CPT - KMMPF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.73%
BSRTF - KMMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.43%
FR - KMMPF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.92%
More