Ad is loading...
FRNRX vs SEPCX
FRNRX vs SEPCX Comparison
Open Charts FRNRX vs SEPCX
Franklin Natural Resources A
Price$28.42
Change+$0.22 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets293.38M
Saratoga Energy & Basic Materials C
Price$8.98
Change+$0.10 (+1.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets982.06K
FRNRX vs SEPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRNRX vs. SEPCX commentary
May 09, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRNRX is a Buy and SEPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FRNRX has more cash in the bank: 293M vs. SEPCX (982K). FRNRX pays higher dividends than SEPCX: FRNRX (2.48) vs SEPCX (1.64). FRNRX was incepted earlier than SEPCX: FRNRX (30 years) vs SEPCX (22 years). SEPCX (4.85) is less costly to investors than FRNRX (1.02). SEPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 47.00 vs. FRNRX (11.86). SEPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FRNRX: SEPCX (250) vs FRNRX (1000). FRNRX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.74 vs. SEPCX (-16.88). FRNRX return over 5 years is better than : 116.97 vs. SEPCX (66.39).
| FRNRX | SEPCX | FRNRX / SEPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.01 | 4.85 | 21% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.02 | 4.85 | 21% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -0.975 | -5.027 | 19% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 250 | 400% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 293M | 982K | 29,837% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 2.48 | 1.64 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.74 | -16.88 | 46% |
| Returns for 3 years | 11.67 | -2.27 | -515% |
| Returns for 5 years | 116.97 | 66.39 | 176% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.94 | -19.85 | 5% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...