Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FRORX vs MDXBX
FRORX vs MDXBX Comparison
Open Charts FRORX vs MDXBX
Franklin OR Tax Free Income A1
Price$9.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets785.11M
T. Rowe Price Maryland Tax-Free Bond
Price$9.66
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.25B
FRORX vs MDXBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FRORX vs. MDXBX commentary
Jul 26, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FRORX is a Hold and MDXBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MDXBX has more cash in the bank: 2.25B vs. FRORX (785M). MDXBX (3.46) and FRORX (3.41) have matching dividends . FRORX was incepted earlier than MDXBX: FRORX (38 years) vs MDXBX (38 years). FRORX (0.66) is less costly to investors than MDXBX (0.53). MDXBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 17.30 vs. FRORX (11.31). FRORX has a lower initial minimum investment than MDXBX: FRORX (1000) vs MDXBX (2500). MDXBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -1.27 vs. FRORX (-2.11). MDXBX return over 5 years is better than : 0.55 vs. FRORX (-7.39).
| FRORX | MDXBX | FRORX / MDXBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.49 | 135% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.66 | 0.53 | 125% |
| Fund Existence | 38 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -3.040 | -2.507 | 121% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 2500 | 40% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 785M | 2.25B | 35% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.41 | 3.46 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.11 | -1.27 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.75 | 4.59 | 16% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.39 | 0.55 | -1,338% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.49 | 11.65 | -30% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement