Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
FROTX vs PRCCX
FROTX vs PRCCX Comparison
Open Charts FROTX vs PRCCX
Franklin Convertible Securities C
Price$23.77
Change-$0.01 (-0.04%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets2.92B
Putnam Convertible Securities C
Price$26.74
Change-$0.07 (-0.26%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets515.67M
FROTX vs PRCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FROTX vs. PRCCX commentary
Sep 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is FROTX is a Hold and PRCCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FROTX has more cash in the bank: 2.92B vs. PRCCX (516M). PRCCX pays higher dividends than FROTX: PRCCX (1.65) vs FROTX (0.63). FROTX was incepted earlier than PRCCX: FROTX (30 years) vs PRCCX (26 years). PRCCX (1.78) is less costly to investors than FROTX (1.59). PRCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. FROTX (37.31). PRCCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FROTX: PRCCX (0) vs FROTX (1000). PRCCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.61 vs. FROTX (12.78). FROTX return over 5 years is better than : -7.94 vs. PRCCX (-8.42).
| FROTX | PRCCX | FROTX / PRCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.58 | 1.78 | 89% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.59 | 1.78 | 89% |
| Fund Existence | 30 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.675 | 8.388 | 80% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 250 | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 2.92B | 516M | 566% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.63 | 1.65 | 38% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.78 | 14.61 | 88% |
| Returns for 3 years | 18.83 | 27.96 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.94 | -8.42 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 46.42 | 24.92 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers